Skip to main content

 There’s a simple way to judge a country: look at whose lives it protects, and whose lives it’s willing to forget. For years now, we’ve heard the phrase “All Lives Matter.” It sounds fair. It sounds equal. It sounds like common sense. But a country doesn’t reveal its values through slogans. It reveals them through actions, through the lives it defends, the lives it ignores, and the lives it quietly pushes out of sight. And lately, America has been doing a whole lot of looking away.


When Black Americans said they were being killed during traffic stops and routine encounters, the response from many leaders wasn’t concern; it was irritation. Instead of saying, “Let’s fix the problem so fewer people die,” we heard “Blue Lives Matter,” “Stop resisting,” and “BLM is a terrorist group.” A man died in a chokehold on camera. We all saw, from the beginning to the end. It was like a modern-day lynching. Millions marched peacefully. The answer from those in power was “law and order,” and “back the blue,” and that BML marchers were terrorists. Not one “let's fix the problem,” not one “let’s make sure this never happens again.” When LeBron James and other basketball players protested, they were told to just “shut up and dribble.” That’s not treating all lives the same. That’s treating some voices as if they shouldn’t be heard and that some lives as disposable.

The same pattern showed up at the border. If all lives mattered, we wouldn’t have taken children from their parents with no plan to reunite them. Thousands of kids, some too young to say their names, were separated, and the government admitted it had no system to match them back up. What type of government does that type of thing? That didn’t happen because we valued life. It happened because the people suffering wasn’t seen as lives worth valuing. In fact, if “all lives” truly mattered, the entire ICE debacle would be handled a whole lot differently.

And now, in the war with Iran, we hear the same kind of distancing language. We talk about “precision strikes,” “military targets,” and “successful operations.” What we don’t talk about are the families living next door to those targets, the kids asleep in the next room, the parents who never saw it coming. In past U.S. wars, independent investigators found entire families killed in strikes the Pentagon first called “clean.” It took months, sometimes years, for the truth to come out. If all lives mattered, we’d talk about those families, too. If all lives mattered, we would stop talking about our casualties and their casualties and be concerned about all casualties. At the White House, the First Lady stated that “we are fighting for those children in a war zone”. Who put them in that war zone? Those children are dying because we put them in that war zone, and more will die before this is over.


The same logic shows up in our budgets. Foreign aid isn’t charity; it’s food, medicine, clean water, and stability. Cutting it doesn’t “save money.” It pushes fragile countries closer to collapse. Yet major cuts were proposed to global health programs, food assistance, disaster relief, and development aid that keep families alive. When we cut these programs, people die, just not people we see on TV. If all lives mattered, we wouldn’t treat foreign lives as disposable simply because they’re far away. Some say we have the power to do away with world hunger. If all lives truly mattered, that would be one of the goals that we would be working towards. Instead of food, many of these countries are being sold guns that just make the people's lives matter even less.

And here at home, we’ve seen cuts to food assistance, Medicaid, housing programs, disability support, childcare, and early education. These programs don’t go to “lazy people.” They go to seniors, disabled Americans, working parents, veterans, and low‑wage workers who do the jobs nobody else wants. Millions of people working full‑time still qualify for food assistance because wages are so low. Cutting those programs doesn’t make them “self‑reliant.” It just makes them hungry. If all lives mattered, we wouldn’t balance budgets on the backs of the people with the least. In fact, if all lives mattered, we would be working to ensure that no one working would need assistance because of low wages. In fact, if all lives mattered, there would be no such thing as a substandard wage.

This is where the story of Pontius Pilate matters. In the Bible, Pilate didn’t swing the hammer. He didn’t drive the nails. He didn’t carry out the execution. He simply washed his hands and said, “Not my responsibility.” That’s what America is doing now. We’re not always the ones pulling the trigger or dropping the bomb or separating the family. But we’re the ones looking away, pretending we don’t see the cost. Not the cost in money but the cost in lives. We’re washing our hands while other people pay the price. And every time we do it, we lose a little more of who we claim to be.

The pattern is simple. Whenever the people suffering are Black, Brown, foreign, poor, or politically inconvenient, their lives get pushed to the bottom of the list. That’s the part nobody wants to say out loud. But it’s the truth. A strong country doesn’t hide from the cost of its actions. A strong country tells the truth, counts every life, and refuses to look away from the people harmed in its name. Right now, we’re not doing that. We’re choosing the easy path, the Pilate path, the hand‑washing path. And if we keep going this way, we won’t just lose our moral compass. We’ll lose our souls.

We now have our President threatening genocide against a nation. This is not how a country portrays that all lives matter. If we’re going to say all lives matter, then it’s time to start acting like it. Not just for the people who look like us, vote like us, worship like us, or live inside our borders, but for everyone whose life is touched by our decisions, at home, at the border, and in every place our power reaches. That means stopping the hand‑washing. Stopping the excuses. Stopping the looking away. And demanding leaders who count every life, not just the ones that make good headlines.

A country that only protects the lives it finds convenient isn’t strong. It’s just comfortable. Strength is when a nation looks squarely at the people harmed in its name and says, “Their lives matter too, and we’re responsible for what we do.” If we want to call ourselves a moral country, a decent country, a country worth handing to the next generation, then we have to stop washing our hands and start owning the consequences of our choices. That’s the work. That’s the challenge. And that’s the only way we get our soul back.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  On Saturday, I was looking at Facebook and a person I was friends with, in fact, someone I went to High School with, posted something I knew was wrong. The post claimed that four lawmakers in Colorado decided jail time shouldn’t be mandatory for people who committed sexual assault of children. She claimed they were pedophile protectors. I opened up Perplexity and asked about the situation, and this is the reply I got back: You’re referring to a recent controversy in Colorado over a proposed bill that would change sentencing rules for certain sex crimes. Here are the verified facts to clarify what’s actually happening: • In early 2026, the Colorado House Judiciary Committee held a vote on a sentencing reform bill that aimed to give judges more discretion in certain felony cases. • Some lawmakers voted against an amendment that would have made mandatory prison sentences apply to all sex crimes, including child sexual assault, preferring instead to let judges determine sentences...
  Dove or hawk? Donald Trump ran for President promising to end “endless wars”, avoid new ones, and put American families first. He cast himself as an outsider who would bring peace – the only candidate who wouldn’t drag America into another conflict. The message worked because let's face it, after so many years in Iraq and Afghanistan, America was tired of war. As a country, we were all tired of War. The country wanted stability, not another generation of men and women sent into danger. But once in office, he governed very differently. He governed like a Hawk, quick to threaten, quick to escalate, and willing to use both bombs and tariffs as weapons. What was missing wasn’t just consistency. It was an honor: the sense of responsibility and restraint that should come with the power to risk other people's sons and daughters. This isn’t about ideology. It's about whether someone who promised peace, but repeatedly chooses confrontation, can still claim to be a “dove”. A core...
  It is Easter again. I walked away from the church years ago, in fact, a long time ago. Why? I just couldn't understand what the Bible said, and what society was becoming, and how they interacted with each other. I saw the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer, and I could no longer reconcile how this fit the teachings of the Gospel. The moment that reminded me why I walked away wasn’t a sermon or a scandal. It was watching a politician, a man who openly admits he doesn’t read the Bible much, argue with the Pope about Jesus as if he were the expert in the room. One man has spent his entire life studying Scripture. The other can’t even quote Scripture. Yet millions of Christians lined up behind the politician anyway. In fact, they have even compared him to Jesus. That was the moment I realized I hadn’t walked away from Jesus. I was walking away from what had been done to him, not by his crucifixion 2000 years ago, but by how we crucify him almost daily today. Whe...