Is it a violation of their oath of office if a president is a racist? I don’t think that would be a good thing, but the short answer would be no. Even if you believed that Trump is the most racist President since before the Civil War, being a racist is not a crime, and it is not a violation of the Constitution. Courts don’t rule on “oath violations” anyway. That is the job of the voters and of Congress. The court decides whether a specific executive action violates a constitutional provision or a valid statute. When a court finds an executive action unconstitutional or unlawful, that action could be interpreted as a violation of the executive's oath. The oath requires loyalty to the constitutional and statutory limits. In my opinion, when historians analyze many of the Trump-era actions that the courts have found to be unconstitutional or unlawful, future generations will ask why he was ever elected. Probably most presidents had unconstitutional rulings that could be interprete...
Every elected official swears an oath to defend the Constitution. Not a party. Not a President, nor any individual. Not a social media following. They swear an oath to the Constitution. They take these oaths of their own free will. No one pointed a gun at their head to seek the office that requires obedience not to a leader but to a document that is our Constitution. What I wonder all the time is how someone can take that oath and then so easily break it. The saddest thing is that it is just all too common. So common that many people don’t notice, and so common that many people don’t care. Here are some very common things that elected officials have done that are actually a violation of their oath. Trying to overturn an election. Pressuring state officials to change election results. Voting to throw out certified votes without evidence. Lying to the public about things they know are not true and using their office to help themselves instead of the country. You don’t need a law de...