Skip to main content

 

Do people look to understand what is being said, or do we just cling to fancy slogans? For 10 years, Trump has been saying,  “Make America Great Again”. Great slogan, but what does it mean? I am going to be totally honest with you, “Make America Great Again” means absolutely nothing. Why would I say that? Because if you were to ask 20 people out there, there would be 20 different answers. What did we do to make America great in the first place? What did we do to make America not great? When Trump started saying it, 10 years ago, Barack Obama was President. Trump, at that time, was like the unofficial head of the birther movement, trying to claim Obama was not a born American. Obama was the first African American President in the history of the United States. I think it kills Trump that Barack Obama was one of the most respected and popular Presidents around the World since Reagan. Funny thing is, since Trump got elected President, he has been trying to eliminate Obama from the history books. I try and figure out what Obama did that made it so America wasn’t great, and the only thing that I can figure out is that, in Trump's eyes, and through the eyes of many of his supporters, America can’t be great if it had a Black President.

Trump and his supporters also like the slogan “America First”. The America First slogan is not a new slogan at all. It was first used in the 1850s nativist “America Party”, also called the “Know Nothing” in the 1850s. It has stood for many different things for over 150 years. The anti-Catholics used it, and so did the Ku Klux Klan. This isolationist used it both pre-WWI and WWII. In some ways, it was a kind of identity politics. The saying is rich in prejudice and violence throughout our history. Historians Steve Fraser and Joshue B. Freeman lend their opinion on the “Know Nothing” and the “Tea Party” movement, stating, “Tea Party populism should also be thought of as a kind of 'identity politics' of the right. Almost entirely White and disproportionately male and older,  Tea Party advocates express a visceral anger at the cultural and, to some extent, political eclipse of an America in which people who look and thought like them were dominant (and echo, in its own way, of the anguish of the Know-Nothings). A Black President, a female speaker of the House, and a gay head of the House Financial Services Committee are evidently almost too much to bear. Though the anti-immigration and the Tea Party movements so far remain largely distinct, they share an emotional grammar: the fear of displacement.”

Now we have Trump and his MAGA movement using the America First pretty much the same way it was used in the past. It is being used because of the fear of displacement, and to put it more accurately, it is the fear of replacement. Trump supporters carrying torches, shouting “Jews will not replace us,” and Trump refusing to condemn them. He is doing away with DEI and replacing women and minorities, claiming that they were DEI hires. When you look at how they are obsessed with getting all the immigrants out of the country, legal or illegal, you truly understand the America First agenda. If you are anti-Black, you are probably a Trump supporter. If you are anti-women, you are probably a Trump supporter. If you are anti-Jewish, you are probably a Trump supporter. If you are anti-Gay, you are probably a Trump supporter. I am sure you are seeing a pattern of not really America First, but anti-anything that challenges the supremacy of the White male.

Trump has no intention of putting America First. This “Make America Great Again” is just a slogan that has no meaning at all. What Trump has been doing is weakening the nation because of all the division that he has intentionally caused. Fancy slogans with no real substance behind them just get him votes from people who are looking for someone to blame. His fancy slogans just feed people hatred and bigotry.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  In 1776 we declared our independence against a Monarch that was above the law. I wonder what John Adams would think about what the Supreme Court just ruled. I believe, what the Supreme Court just ruled is contrary to what the intention of the men that wrote and approved our Declaration of Independence.   This Fourth of July it would be a good idea if everyone would start out by reading the Declaration of Independence. The words that always have always stuck with me are “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Do those words still hold true? The three branches of the Government get their just powers from the people. Not the rich people. Not the Republicans. Not the Democrats. It is...
This is my continued search on whether Trump has the Character to be President. A person I know stated “His character matters bc it is in the character I believe he has the leadership, knowledge, wisdom, experience, compassion, integrity that will lead us on the path towards a more safe, secure, healthy, prosperous, free world than the direction we are headed.” My last blog looked at his character as integrity from a legal standpoint before he even was elected President. From a legal standpoint there is no way I would have thought he had the integrity to be President. Now I will look at some of his Moral Integrity and Compassion that should be there from the man that sits in the White House.  I have to say something about Donald Trump, he sure is a believer in the institution of marriage. He likes marriage so much that he has said “I do” three times. What his problem with marriage is the actual vow that he has to take. You know that love, honor, and cherish until death do us part. ...
  I will tell you that I am no Christian, but I will tell you that I was raised in a Christian household. I was baptized, went to Sunday School, was Confirmed, and attended church into adulthood. Because of that upbringing, I still think about the morals I learned from that religious upbringing. To this day, I judge right and wrong by what I learned in that church. There has been a little bit of a dispute between The Pope of the Catholic Church, the Trump administration, the deportations, and Catholic convert Vance and his use of the concept from the medieval Catholic theology known in Latin as “Ordo Amoris”. I guess Vance has said the concept delineates a hierarchy of care – to family first, followed by neighbor, community, fellow citizen, and lastly those elsewhere. Being raised a Protestant I had never heard of it but then the Lutheran Church has no medieval saint.   I searched on the web and asked if “Ordo Amoris” was in the Bible and the short answer would be “no”. It i...