Skip to main content

 

The inmates are running the asylum! That is what it looks like to me. Their entire administration is not based on anything that resembles sanity. They attacked Iran, a sovereign country, saying they were going to end Iran’s nuclear program. Can they end Iran’s nuclear program with one bombing mission? Does Trump think Iran is so terrified of him that they will just roll over? I remember the start of Desert Storm. We bombed Iraq constantly for days before we sent coalition troops into Iraq. It was a well-planned offensive that was effective in achieving the goals. It was also a very secretive offensive, not something that was talked about on social media. Wars are not won on social media. This was not even a war. This was a military attack on strategic military targets meant to deter Iran’s nuclear capabilities. To call this a war is just a joke. The fact that everything has been announced on social media by Trump makes it seem like just a way to manipulate the story.

Is this the end of conflicts in the Middle East? I doubt it. Two major powers have strong ties with Iran. One of course is Russia, and the other is China. What did Russia have to say about the attack by the United States? Russian Ambassador Nebenzia stated, “Washington reasserted that, to further the interests of its Israeli ally, it’s prepared not only to turn a blind eye to the killings of tens of thousands of Palestinian women, children, and older persons but also to gamble with the safety and well-being of humanity as a whole. Through their actions, the U.S. has opened Pandora’s box. No one knows what new catastrophes and suffering it will bring.” The deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia said that Trump “has pushed the US into another war” and that countries are “ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads.” China stated “if the Middle East is unstable, the world will not be at peace. If the conflict escalates further, not only will the conflicting parties suffer greater losses, but regional countries will suffer greatly.” China’s Ambassador to the UN stated that the U.S. attacks in Iran seriously violate the purposes and principles of the UN charter and international law. As well as Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

I have written before on what I have called the first laws that were created. Those laws were not written on some tablet and delivered to Moses. These laws were meant to be discovered intellectually, and those are the laws of physics. For every action, there will be a reaction. Now let's go back to Desert Storm. Iraq had illegally invaded Kuwait. The United States formed a coalition of nations that drove Iraq out of Kuwait. Our involvement in that war led directly to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 because of our presence in the Middle East. It took years for the reaction, but the reaction happened, and 3000 Americans died, and the New York skyline was changed forever. Was the attack on 9/11 sponsored by a country? No! Most of the attackers were Saudi’s but Saudi Arabia did not sponsor the attack. Osama Bin Laden was a Saudi, but that did not mean the Saudi government had anything to do with the attack. Terror groups are not a country; they are an idea, and what ideas did our attack on Iran start?

9/11 happened over 10 years after Desert Storm, and I am sure the Bush administration never envisioned the things that were set in motion because of it. That is my point, we don’t know what things we set in motion. Our war on terror has never been a war against two traditional nations with a traditional military. We will never know if it is a war we have won because there will be no formal surrender. There will be no laying down of arms like after the World Wars. Terrorist organizations are formed from an idea or ideology. It is hard to defeat an idea with weapons. What it may take is a better idea.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  In 1776 we declared our independence against a Monarch that was above the law. I wonder what John Adams would think about what the Supreme Court just ruled. I believe, what the Supreme Court just ruled is contrary to what the intention of the men that wrote and approved our Declaration of Independence.   This Fourth of July it would be a good idea if everyone would start out by reading the Declaration of Independence. The words that always have always stuck with me are “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Do those words still hold true? The three branches of the Government get their just powers from the people. Not the rich people. Not the Republicans. Not the Democrats. It is...
This is my continued search on whether Trump has the Character to be President. A person I know stated “His character matters bc it is in the character I believe he has the leadership, knowledge, wisdom, experience, compassion, integrity that will lead us on the path towards a more safe, secure, healthy, prosperous, free world than the direction we are headed.” My last blog looked at his character as integrity from a legal standpoint before he even was elected President. From a legal standpoint there is no way I would have thought he had the integrity to be President. Now I will look at some of his Moral Integrity and Compassion that should be there from the man that sits in the White House.  I have to say something about Donald Trump, he sure is a believer in the institution of marriage. He likes marriage so much that he has said “I do” three times. What his problem with marriage is the actual vow that he has to take. You know that love, honor, and cherish until death do us part. ...
  I will tell you that I am no Christian, but I will tell you that I was raised in a Christian household. I was baptized, went to Sunday School, was Confirmed, and attended church into adulthood. Because of that upbringing, I still think about the morals I learned from that religious upbringing. To this day, I judge right and wrong by what I learned in that church. There has been a little bit of a dispute between The Pope of the Catholic Church, the Trump administration, the deportations, and Catholic convert Vance and his use of the concept from the medieval Catholic theology known in Latin as “Ordo Amoris”. I guess Vance has said the concept delineates a hierarchy of care – to family first, followed by neighbor, community, fellow citizen, and lastly those elsewhere. Being raised a Protestant I had never heard of it but then the Lutheran Church has no medieval saint.   I searched on the web and asked if “Ordo Amoris” was in the Bible and the short answer would be “no”. It i...