Skip to main content

 

There has been a falling out at the White House. I know, shocking. What I am surprised at is that there hasn’t been more. In this case, the fallout is between Elon Musk, Trump's former head of the Department of Government Efficiency, which, by the way, is a made-up department, and Trump himself. What they are fighting about is what surprises me. They are fighting over Trump's “Big Beautiful Bill”. Now, don’t start thinking that Musk has seen the light. Musk’s big complaint with the bill was that it is going to increase the deficit. People have been talking about that all along. That is what giving to billionaires does to the deficit: it makes it grow. It has been that way since Reagan, and it is still that way today. It will also be that way tomorrow. They have tried to tell us they will pay for themselves. That has never happened. They have said that it will create jobs. That has never happened in the numbers we were led to believe. What it has created is a group for people who think their money gives them power, power they think should go unchecked by the government and the people.

There is a lot of mud-slinging now between Trump and Musk. It all started after Musk left the Trump Administration and started lobbying against Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill”. Musk has called the bill a “disgusting abomination” and posted, “Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong”. He has stated that the bill was irresponsible because it added to the national debt. He encouraged his followers to phone their Representatives to express their opposition to the bill. Trump had a news conference with the German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, saying, “I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. All of a sudden, he has a problem.”

I, too, was surprised Musk seemed surprised the bill would add to the deficit. Since before the election, experts had been saying that Trump would add to the deficit. When was the last Republican President who didn’t add to the deficit? Eisenhower maybe? Republicans have always talked about fiscal Responsibility, but only when there was a Democrat in the White House.

Trump suggested Musk was upset about the removal of the subsidies and mandates for electric vehicles that would affect Musk's Tesla business. Musk countered, “Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill. Even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), But ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.” I just want to know what planet Musk has been on for the last nine years. The motto of the Republican Party has been “drill, baby, drill”. They want to open up huge sections of the National Forest to oil exploration. They pretty much want to give the oil company carte blanche to drill for oil. Trump has always talked about expanding oil and abandoning any green initiatives that were in place, and that is what driving an electric car is: it is a green initiative. That is one of the reasons why I thought that a Trump/Musk alliance was always headed for a disaster. One of Trump's goals has always been to do away with electric cars. That is why I always thought it was a strange alliance and why I wondered if Musk truly believed in his own car business. Many of his core customers were those people who believed in Climate Change and that buying a Tesla was their way of helping the planet. Musk became best buds and working partners with the Trump Administration, which was, in a way, turning his back on the people who had supported his business, the believers in Climate Change. To put it bluntly, Musk joined the “climate deniers”.

Musk has been very aggressive on Twitter and posted, “Without me, Trump would have lost the election. Dems would control the House, and the Republicans would be 51-49  in the Senate.”  He also posted asking his followers, “Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?” Not a bad idea, but one I am sure Musk would never do. Musk has posted a tweet calling for Trump to resign and that his global tariff plan will trigger a recession. Many people have said the same thing about Trump’s tariffs since before the election, so for Musk to speak up now instead of before Trump was elected, he looks like a man who is acting more like a spiteful ex-wife than a concerned businessman. Musk sunk millions and millions into the Trump campaign, knowing that Trump was a big fan of using tariffs as a form of revenge and control over other countries around the globe. To speak up now just shows the depth of his lust for power and has nothing to do with the good of the country or even his businesses.

Musk has also tweeted, without proof, that Trump's name is all over the Epstein Report. Most of us have believed that from the very beginning. Some people believe that Epstein’s death was not a suicide.  If Musk had information about Trump and Epstein, I would think it would have been his duty to have made that information public before the election. Are we to believe that he supported a suspected pedophile to be President of the United States? I have always believed the entire Epstein report should have been released years ago. Many of us feel the only reason it hasn’t been is because of all the Rich and Powerful people who, if they had done wrong, have no business being protected in the first place.

Trump has now threatened to take away all of Musk's subsidies and government contracts. Let's face it, much of Musk's wealth has been built on money from the government, taxpayers' money.  What we have been witnessing is two very corrupt billionaires who have no regard for the American people whom they harm and the Constitution that they defy every day.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  In 1776 we declared our independence against a Monarch that was above the law. I wonder what John Adams would think about what the Supreme Court just ruled. I believe, what the Supreme Court just ruled is contrary to what the intention of the men that wrote and approved our Declaration of Independence.   This Fourth of July it would be a good idea if everyone would start out by reading the Declaration of Independence. The words that always have always stuck with me are “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Do those words still hold true? The three branches of the Government get their just powers from the people. Not the rich people. Not the Republicans. Not the Democrats. It is...
This is my continued search on whether Trump has the Character to be President. A person I know stated “His character matters bc it is in the character I believe he has the leadership, knowledge, wisdom, experience, compassion, integrity that will lead us on the path towards a more safe, secure, healthy, prosperous, free world than the direction we are headed.” My last blog looked at his character as integrity from a legal standpoint before he even was elected President. From a legal standpoint there is no way I would have thought he had the integrity to be President. Now I will look at some of his Moral Integrity and Compassion that should be there from the man that sits in the White House.  I have to say something about Donald Trump, he sure is a believer in the institution of marriage. He likes marriage so much that he has said “I do” three times. What his problem with marriage is the actual vow that he has to take. You know that love, honor, and cherish until death do us part. ...
  I will tell you that I am no Christian, but I will tell you that I was raised in a Christian household. I was baptized, went to Sunday School, was Confirmed, and attended church into adulthood. Because of that upbringing, I still think about the morals I learned from that religious upbringing. To this day, I judge right and wrong by what I learned in that church. There has been a little bit of a dispute between The Pope of the Catholic Church, the Trump administration, the deportations, and Catholic convert Vance and his use of the concept from the medieval Catholic theology known in Latin as “Ordo Amoris”. I guess Vance has said the concept delineates a hierarchy of care – to family first, followed by neighbor, community, fellow citizen, and lastly those elsewhere. Being raised a Protestant I had never heard of it but then the Lutheran Church has no medieval saint.   I searched on the web and asked if “Ordo Amoris” was in the Bible and the short answer would be “no”. It i...