Skip to main content

 

Never once have I ever read in the Bible where Jesus said, “God bless the Roman Empire”. Never once have I read in the Bible of Jesus standing to pay homage to the symbols of the Roman Empire. Never once have I read Jesus combining his teachings with the Rule of the Roman Empire. I began thinking of that when I was watching the 4th of July celebration on PBS, and there was a guy waving an American flag, and wearing a red hat that said, “Make America Pray Again”. That struck me as so anti-Jesus because that was what Jesus was not about. That is the last thing that the man that we call Christ would have been doing, in my opinion. Patriotic to a Government, whether it was Roman, Israel, or Jerusalem, was not what he was about. We have patriotic songs like the “Battle Hymn of the Republic” and “Onward Christian Soldiers,” and I have asked myself many times, would Jesus have marched off to war leading an Army? He was the man who let himself be tried by the Romans, did not offer any defense, and was crucified by the Romans. That was a man of sacrifice and not of violence. He was not a leader of men like a President or a General. He was a leader of men, like a shepherd who would lead his sheep to water so they could drink. I am not saying that all wars can be avoided because I know we have to stand up to tyranny, but we are not being led by the word of God or Jesus.  

I used to be a fairly religious person, but it was the confusion of the Church and the Bible that made me turn away from the church. I do not see very many so-called religious people practicing the teachings of Jesus, and I definitely do not see our government controlled by the Republican party practicing anything close to the teachings of Jesus. Churches do not create freedom. If anything, they restrict freedom. Bringing prayer into our schools does not enhance freedom. Posting the Ten Commandments in our schools does not enhance our freedoms. Forcing one's religion is not freedom. These are methods of control, and control and freedom are on opposite sides of the spectrum. We have a Speaker of the House who has compared himself to Moses. Moses delivered the Israelites from slavery and bondage from the tyrannical ruling class of Egypt. Speaker Johnson has helped deliver people who many were already living in poverty into concentration camps like the camp that the Republicans are opening in the Everglades.

Speaker Johnson was very instrumental in the passage of  Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill”. What it could be called is the “anti-teachings of Jesus” bill. This “One Big Beautiful Bill” increases the budget for ICE to imprison people in Trump’s concentration camp, like the one they are opening in the Everglades. All your religious people who support Trump’s immigration policies, please read Matthew 25:31-46. Read it and then tell me that what Trump is doing is inspired by God or in line with the Bible, his so-called favorite book. All you people, read the entire book of Matthew and tell me that anything in Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” is inspired by the teachings of Jesus. How is denying millions of people healthcare part of the teachings of Jesus? How is cutting food supplements to the poor part of the teachings of Jesus? How is not protecting the planet we all have to live on part of the teachings of Jesus? Climate change affects the poor, the people living in poverty, not only in the United States but all over the world. We see people suffering and dying around the world because of our changing climate, and we do nothing. Not because we don’t have the technology to do something, but because it is not profitable to do something.

Back in 2017, I was always envious of people who had stronger faith than I did; I thought of it as a gift that I had not received yet. Back in 2017, when Trump was first elected, I thought the Church would never put up with Trump. I had faith that the Church was one of the institutions that would stand up to Trump and his cruelty. I thought Christians would help save America like they helped found it. Instead, the Church embraced him. Why? Because of the abortion issue? I never would have believed that the Church would turn its back on the teachings of Jesus for an issue that Jesus never talked about. That is right, Jesus never talked about abortion, even though the first written account of abortion was written 1500 years before the birth of Jesus. He did talk about helping the poor. He did talk about healing the sick. He did say, “Suffer the children not”. I never thought that so many Christians would lie at the feet of a man who was more like Herod than anything else. Yup, Trump, the man who has had five children from 3 different women. The man who cheated on multiple wives. The man who sells autographed copies of the Bible. He tries to profit from the teachings of Jesus even though he has never read the teachings of Jesus. The man whose only cathedral on Sundays is a golf course. He was now considered a vessel to God. Some treat him as the second coming.

I long for the day long ago when the message of Jesus was the major part of the teachings of the Church. I long for the day when men of religion thought we should all walk together as brothers. I long for the day when the Church and our Government were two distinct and separate institutions. I long for the day when the Church thought it was important to lift people up and not imprison them for the color of their skin or the language that they speak. I long for a Church that thought the contents of a man’s heart were more important than the position he held. I long for the days of a man saying, “I have a Dream”.  What I want now is a country that works to make that dream come true. What we have now is a country that is filled with Hatred, Racism, Bigotry, and threats of violence.

 

 

Comments

  1. Problem is, my MAGA clients tell me that nothing is being taken away from “legal” Americans, they are just fixing “waste, fraud and abuse”.Those are their new favorite words. By the time it affects them, it’s already too late.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  There’s a simple way to judge a country: look at whose lives it protects, and whose lives it’s willing to forget. For years now, we’ve heard the phrase “All Lives Matter.” It sounds fair. It sounds equal. It sounds like common sense. But a country doesn’t reveal its values through slogans. It reveals them through actions, through the lives it defends, the lives it ignores, and the lives it quietly pushes out of sight. And lately, America has been doing a whole lot of looking away. When Black Americans said they were being killed during traffic stops and routine encounters, the response from many leaders wasn’t concern; it was irritation. Instead of saying, “Let’s fix the problem so fewer people die,” we heard “Blue Lives Matter,” “Stop resisting,” and “BLM is a terrorist group.” A man died in a chokehold on camera. We all saw, from the beginning to the end. It was like a modern-day lynching. Millions marched peacefully. The answer from those in power was “law and order,” and “...
  On Saturday, I was looking at Facebook and a person I was friends with, in fact, someone I went to High School with, posted something I knew was wrong. The post claimed that four lawmakers in Colorado decided jail time shouldn’t be mandatory for people who committed sexual assault of children. She claimed they were pedophile protectors. I opened up Perplexity and asked about the situation, and this is the reply I got back: You’re referring to a recent controversy in Colorado over a proposed bill that would change sentencing rules for certain sex crimes. Here are the verified facts to clarify what’s actually happening: • In early 2026, the Colorado House Judiciary Committee held a vote on a sentencing reform bill that aimed to give judges more discretion in certain felony cases. • Some lawmakers voted against an amendment that would have made mandatory prison sentences apply to all sex crimes, including child sexual assault, preferring instead to let judges determine sentences...
  Dove or hawk? Donald Trump ran for President promising to end “endless wars”, avoid new ones, and put American families first. He cast himself as an outsider who would bring peace – the only candidate who wouldn’t drag America into another conflict. The message worked because let's face it, after so many years in Iraq and Afghanistan, America was tired of war. As a country, we were all tired of War. The country wanted stability, not another generation of men and women sent into danger. But once in office, he governed very differently. He governed like a Hawk, quick to threaten, quick to escalate, and willing to use both bombs and tariffs as weapons. What was missing wasn’t just consistency. It was an honor: the sense of responsibility and restraint that should come with the power to risk other people's sons and daughters. This isn’t about ideology. It's about whether someone who promised peace, but repeatedly chooses confrontation, can still claim to be a “dove”. A core...