Skip to main content

 

Trump has now declared a public safety emergency in Washington, D.C. He has invoked emergency powers under the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, placing the Metropolitan Police Department under federal control. He sees this as a “historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam, and squalor”. He has also announced the deployment of 800 National Guard troops to the Capital. Trump cited a surge in violent crime as justification. In the announcement, he mentioned a recent assault on a government staffer. The problem with all of this is that it contradicts what the data is saying. The data says that violent crime in D.C is down 35 percent and is actually at a 30-year low. Homicides, robberies, and carjackings have all seen a significant decline this year. According to the data, Mayor Muriel Bowser has described the move as unsettling and unprecedented.  Trump called it “Liberation Day”. Many Americans consider this a hostile takeover. When the British troops took over Boston, the citizens did not look upon it as “Liberation Day”; it was an assault on their freedoms and liberty.

 Let’s be clear: this was not a response to a crime wave. Violent crime in D.C. is down 35% from last year. Homicides, robberies, and carjackings have all declined. Looking at the data, the local government is doing a good job. The city is safer than it’s been in over 30 years. Trump’s justification—a single assault on a government staffer—was not a crisis. It was a pretext. This move is unprecedented. Under the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, the president can assume control of the Metropolitan Police Department for 48 hours in an emergency. Where is the emergency? Trump has already signaled his intent to extend that control. What’s unfolding is not a temporary intervention—it’s a test of how far executive power can stretch when cloaked in the language of law and order. This is not just about D.C. It’s about the future of federalism, civil liberties, and democratic norms. If a president can unilaterally deploy troops and seize control of a city’s police based on dubious claims, what stops him from doing so elsewhere? What checks remain?

 Supporters argue that Trump is restoring order. But order without accountability is authoritarianism. The real danger is not the troops on the ground—it’s the normalization of executive overreach. I have been to Washington, D.C., and  I have walked all around the National Mall at night and then back to my hotel. I felt safe the entire time. I have taken the subway and found it well patrolled, and it was kept immaculate. I saw the homeless and was never intimidated by them, though I was saddened that even in our capital, there were not enough services in place to take care of the problem. It is an embarrassment that the so-called greatest country on earth doesn’t work at solving the homeless and mental health problems that are all over the country, let alone our capital. Treating the homeless like criminals is not the thing to do, let alone the Christian thing to do.

Could all of this be just a smoke screen? The data doesn’t match the rhetoric. When the data doesn’t match the rhetoric, it raises the question: What is the real motive? Trump has a long history of dramatic gestures to energize his base. Is this to shift attention away from the economic problems that we are having? He ran on the pledge that he was going to lower prices from day one. Anyone who has been to a grocery store knows that prices are rising and not coming down. I have not seen a single thing being done to lower our prices. He lowered taxes for billionaires, but because of his tariffs, it is a hidden tax on the middle class and the poor, because we have to pay more for just about everything. Could it be that he has failed to end the war in Ukraine that he said he would end in 24 hours? Is it to shift attention away from the Epstein files? He ran on transparency and said that he would make the Epstein files public. Could it be to deflect attention away from Ghislaine Maxwell and the fact that he transferred a person convicted to 20 years for trafficking young girls to a minimum-security prison? He could be trying to avoid legal and ethical controversies that are dogging his presidency. Creating a spectacle in our nation's capital can dominate headlines and drown out scrutiny elsewhere. This may be an effort at political retaliation disguised as public safety.

Declaring “Liberation Day” and deploying troops plays into a narrative of strength and control, but it is only an illusion. We know that the National Guard does not have the authority to arrest people and that they will be limited to protecting federal landmarks and buildings that are not under threat. The last time a federal building was under attack was January 6th, 2021, when he sent domestic terrorists to try and overthrow Congress and steal the election, and he didn’t call up the National Guard. He pardoned all of those domestic terrorists. His tough talk sounds good at a press conference. He may also be testing the boundaries of Executive Powers.  D.C is uniquely vulnerable because it is not a state, making it an easy proving ground for federal overreach.

Supporters argue that Trump is restoring order. But order without accountability is authoritarianism or what many would call fascism. The real danger is not the troops on the ground—it’s the normalization of executive overreach. We must not mistake this moment for routine politics because it isn’t normal at all. It is a warning shot. And if we fail to respond, we risk watching the foundations of our democracy erode under the weight of manufactured emergencies just like this manufactured emergency.

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Well, there is a convicted felon vandalizing the White House. Weird dude with orange makeup, often babbles. Maybe the Guard can find and arrest him.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This is my continued search on whether Trump has the Character to be President. A person I know stated “His character matters bc it is in the character I believe he has the leadership, knowledge, wisdom, experience, compassion, integrity that will lead us on the path towards a more safe, secure, healthy, prosperous, free world than the direction we are headed.” My last blog looked at his character as integrity from a legal standpoint before he even was elected President. From a legal standpoint there is no way I would have thought he had the integrity to be President. Now I will look at some of his Moral Integrity and Compassion that should be there from the man that sits in the White House.  I have to say something about Donald Trump, he sure is a believer in the institution of marriage. He likes marriage so much that he has said “I do” three times. What his problem with marriage is the actual vow that he has to take. You know that love, honor, and cherish until death do us part. ...
  I will tell you that I am no Christian, but I will tell you that I was raised in a Christian household. I was baptized, went to Sunday School, was Confirmed, and attended church into adulthood. Because of that upbringing, I still think about the morals I learned from that religious upbringing. To this day, I judge right and wrong by what I learned in that church. There has been a little bit of a dispute between The Pope of the Catholic Church, the Trump administration, the deportations, and Catholic convert Vance and his use of the concept from the medieval Catholic theology known in Latin as “Ordo Amoris”. I guess Vance has said the concept delineates a hierarchy of care – to family first, followed by neighbor, community, fellow citizen, and lastly those elsewhere. Being raised a Protestant I had never heard of it but then the Lutheran Church has no medieval saint.   I searched on the web and asked if “Ordo Amoris” was in the Bible and the short answer would be “no”. It i...
  MAGA called Biden a dictator, a Tyrant, a Nazi, a Communist, and the head of the Biden Crime Family. Biden was, of course, none of those things. Biden was a good Christian man who believed in God and the American system. When Biden said “God Bless America”, he meant it, whereas many politicians say, “God Bless America” only because they want your vote. Many people will say that Biden was weak. I don’t say that he was weak but I understand why some would say that. He believed in the system and he believed in the American people. It was our voice that was supposed to be important. It was not just his responsibility for our Democratic Republic to survive and flourish it was our responsibility too. Have we, as a country, lost our faith in our Democratic Republic? Have we lost the vision that was our Forefathers? Do today's Americans even understand what their vision was? What is a government by the People, of the People for the People?   Is that even close to what we have toda...