Skip to main content

 

I went in search to see if any national election, Presidential or Congressional had ever been canceled. Ever since 1788, every Presidential and Congressional election has been held on time. We have had the Civil War, World Wars, and pandemics, and every federal election has proceeded on schedule. Why? I would want to think America has always embraced the vision of Representative Government that our Founding Fathers believed in and fought for. They wrote and confirmed our Constitution, showing the entire world their vision of democracy.

We have had historical stress tests on why continuing our elections even during a national election matters. In 1864, our country was literally at war with itself in the Great Civil War. Lincoln insisted the election proceed, arguing that cancelling it would be a victory for disunion. Voters cast their ballots even from the battlefields, showing that during times of stress, we had to adapt so people could vote. During the Great Depression in 1932, there was no delay in our elections, even though unemployment was at 25%. During World War II, the 1944 election was held, despite millions of Americans being overseas. Congress created absentee voting rather than trying to postpone the election. Additionally, the same phenomenon occurred during the Korean and Vietnam Wars. In fact, during both of those wars, we had a change in Presidents and political parties as a result of the elections. During the Cold War and fears of nuclear attack, our elections continued. Post 9/11, the Department of Homeland Security reviewed whether a catastrophic attack could justify postponement. The conclusion was that no federal authority exists to cancel or delay a national election. Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, the most widespread domestic emergency in modern history, the elections went on. States modified how people voted, but the most important thing was that people were still able to vote, and the federal election was held on time. The bottom line is that every national election since the founding of our Constitution has been held on time. No wars, no pandemic, no economic collapse, no terrorist attack has ever stopped it.

Remembering that no federal election has been cancelled in our entire history, there has been one person just suggesting that. That person would be Donald Trump. Donald Trump has repeatedly floated the idea of canceling, skipping, or delegitimizing future elections, especially the 2026 midterms. Of course, later it was stated that he was “joking”, but this is the man who wanted an angry mob hang his Vice President because in 2020 refused to not do his constitutional duty and certify the 2020 election as requested by Trump. Trump has stated that “We shouldn’t even have elections”  in 2026, arguing that his administration has accomplished so much that voting is unnecessary. Twice in interviews, Trump has floated the idea of canceling the upcoming midterm elections, saying Republicans might lose seats and implying elections were unnecessary. At a House Republican retreat, he talked about canceling future elections altogether. Then again, at another Republican gathering, he raised the possibility of canceling the midterms. In an interview with Reuters, he again talked about skipping the midterms and suggested he might not accept the outcome of the elections if the Republicans lost. Some have stated that Trump is joking, but Trump really doesn’t joke like that. His past record has shown he is dead serious.

This pattern of talking about canceling elections and not accepting the results has really alarmed lawmakers and analysts who see it as part of a broader challenge to our democracy. I see it as a direct challenge to our democracy and a real rejection of our Constitution. By the Constitution, the President has no authority to cancel or reschedule any election.   By the Constitution, the House of Representatives must be elected every two years. If the midterms were not held, would we have a House of Representatives because every standing Representative's term would have expired? Not by Constitutional standards in my opinion. Many Senators' terms are going to end. If the election were not held, would every state be represented by two Senators as demanded by the Constitution? The answer would be no. Trump and every Republican have taken an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution, so if those midterm elections were not held, that would basically mean the end of the Constitution and our Democratic Republic.

Trump has stated in the past that he would not accept the election loss if he was the one who lost. He refused to accept the results of the 2020 election and sent Domestic Terrorist to try to interfere with the certification of the results. To this day, he continues to deny that he lost, no matter how many challenges to the results he lost. He stated, “If you count the legal votes, I easily win. If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the election from us.” He has made that statement even though there has been no evidence that there were illegal votes that turned the election against him. Funny how if he wins the election is legal, and if he loses, the election is rigged.

 When you really look at it, you can see that this is some real third-world stuff. Refusing to accept the results of an election is unusual for a democracy. It is more about a situation that happens in a declining democracy. Are we a declining Democracy? Over two centuries, every candidate has accepted the certified results of an election. That is, until Donald Trump. He is the only U.S. Presidential candidate to refuse to accept his own election loss. Trump's denial aligns more closely with global patterns seen in countries like Kenya, Belarus, Zimbabwe, Honduras, and Venezuela. Why does this matter? It weakens public confidence in democratic institutions and increases the risk of political violence, as seen on January 6th. Trump's refusals to accept the results of elections and his attack on the election process here are more typical of a democracy under stress and not the long -established stable democracy we once were.

 

Comments

  1. The 2000 election is when I realized democracy and voting in this country was in grave danger. I remember several political pundits saying back then that the Florida-Bush/Gore fiasco was an embarrassment. We supposedly led the world to accept democracy over Soviet communism and we couldn't even count votes correctly.

    I believe trump will disrupt the mid-terms by having his ICE hordes at Democratic-leaning polling places to at a minimum scare off voters. More than likely he'll have them attack people instead and blame it on "illegals" trying to vote.

    We're screwed on so many levels.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What we are going through as a nation is so bizarre. The people supporting Trump could not have chosen a worse president. We have had presidents before who did not always handle matters in the best way possible, but Trump does everything in the worst way possible. Our citizenry is woefully uninformed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  On Saturday, I was looking at Facebook and a person I was friends with, in fact, someone I went to High School with, posted something I knew was wrong. The post claimed that four lawmakers in Colorado decided jail time shouldn’t be mandatory for people who committed sexual assault of children. She claimed they were pedophile protectors. I opened up Perplexity and asked about the situation, and this is the reply I got back: You’re referring to a recent controversy in Colorado over a proposed bill that would change sentencing rules for certain sex crimes. Here are the verified facts to clarify what’s actually happening: • In early 2026, the Colorado House Judiciary Committee held a vote on a sentencing reform bill that aimed to give judges more discretion in certain felony cases. • Some lawmakers voted against an amendment that would have made mandatory prison sentences apply to all sex crimes, including child sexual assault, preferring instead to let judges determine sentences...
  Dove or hawk? Donald Trump ran for President promising to end “endless wars”, avoid new ones, and put American families first. He cast himself as an outsider who would bring peace – the only candidate who wouldn’t drag America into another conflict. The message worked because let's face it, after so many years in Iraq and Afghanistan, America was tired of war. As a country, we were all tired of War. The country wanted stability, not another generation of men and women sent into danger. But once in office, he governed very differently. He governed like a Hawk, quick to threaten, quick to escalate, and willing to use both bombs and tariffs as weapons. What was missing wasn’t just consistency. It was an honor: the sense of responsibility and restraint that should come with the power to risk other people's sons and daughters. This isn’t about ideology. It's about whether someone who promised peace, but repeatedly chooses confrontation, can still claim to be a “dove”. A core...
  It is Easter again. I walked away from the church years ago, in fact, a long time ago. Why? I just couldn't understand what the Bible said, and what society was becoming, and how they interacted with each other. I saw the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer, and I could no longer reconcile how this fit the teachings of the Gospel. The moment that reminded me why I walked away wasn’t a sermon or a scandal. It was watching a politician, a man who openly admits he doesn’t read the Bible much, argue with the Pope about Jesus as if he were the expert in the room. One man has spent his entire life studying Scripture. The other can’t even quote Scripture. Yet millions of Christians lined up behind the politician anyway. In fact, they have even compared him to Jesus. That was the moment I realized I hadn’t walked away from Jesus. I was walking away from what had been done to him, not by his crucifixion 2000 years ago, but by how we crucify him almost daily today. Whe...