Violence Has a Side – America Needs to Stop Pretending It Doesn’t
Saturday night's alleged
assassination attempt shocked the country. Any act of political violence is
unacceptable, no matter who the target is. But at times like these, we need to speak
honestly about political violence in America. One shocking event doesn’t erase
the pattern we’ve been living with for years. And it doesn’t change the fact
that violence in this country has been rising in one direction far more than the
other.
I want to think that most
Americans, conservative, liberal, and independent, want the same basic things: safety,
stability, and a country where ballots, not bullets, settle disagreements. We
will never get there if we keep lying to ourselves about where the political violence
is actually coming from. It is not “both sides.” It has never been “both sides.”
Pretending otherwise is part of why the problem keeps getting worse. You don’t
need a think tank or be a rocket scientist to see it. Just look at what has happened
in plain sight.
In 2022, a man broke into
the home of the Speaker of the House and attacked her husband with a hammer. He
intended to kidnap the Speaker of the House, who wasn’t home at the time. According
to court filings, he was driven by right-wing conspiracy theories about political
leaders and secret plots. That wasn’t a random crime. It was political violence
fueled by lies. What was Trump's reaction? Trump mockingly said, “Nancy has a
big wall around her house. Of course, it didn’t help much with the problems they
had, did it?” Of course, that got a laugh. He also promoted a false conspiracy
theory, claiming the broken “from inside to the out” suggesting it was a “breakout”,
a claim that contradicted the evidence and the police footage. There was no condemnation
of the attack from Trump. Other Republicans, including Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin
and Arizona candidate Kari Lake, made remarks perceived as mocking.
On January 6th,
the world, including me, watched thousands of people storm the U.S. Capitol to
stop the certification of electoral votes. Indictments describe individuals
motivated by lies about the election. They were joined by right-wing militia-aligned
groups who came prepared for confrontation. The goal was unmistakable: to overturn
a constitutional process by force. Whose lies did they listen to? Trumps!
In Michigan, a group influenced
by right-wing anti-government ideology plotted to kidnap the Governor of
Michigan. Trump actually cast doubts on the seriousness of the plot, saying at
a rally, “Maybe it was a problem, maybe it wasn’t,” and later indicated he would
consider pardoning the convicted plotters, calling the case a “railroad job.”
In Minnesota, the danger
became undeniable. In June 2025, Vance Boelter impersonated a police officer,
went door-to-door to Democratic lawmakers’ homes, shot State Sen. John Hoffman
nine times, shot his wife eight times, and then murdered former House Speaker
Melissa Hortman and her husband. This wasn’t a random crime; it was the
predictable result of years of rhetoric by the right portraying public servants
from the wrong side of the aisle as enemies. Everyone, including Trump condemned
the killing, but then the Right started spreading false information about the
shooter. The false reports said that the shooter was an ally of Minnesota
Governor Tim Walz. Elon Musk shared tweets saying “the left” had killed Horton.
U.S. senator Mike Lee tweeted multiple times that the suspect was a “Marxist”
and blamed the assassination on Waltz. Donald Trump Jr. falsely claimed that
the shooter “seems to be a leftist” and was a “Democrat”. Right-wing
commentator Mike Cernovich claimed that Walz had ordered the assassination.
Laura Loomer called the shooter one of “Waltz goons” and called for Waltz to be
“detained” and “interrogated” by the FBI.
Across the country election
workers have been threatened and harassed by people who have believed the lies
about election fraud. These are normal Americans who were put in harm's way
because of the election lies, and who were telling those lies?
Let's not forget the white
supremacist marching in Charlottesville carrying torches and chanting antisemitic
slogans. Trump did not condemn them. Why? I think it was because they were
marching for the racism and bigotry that Trump brings to the table.
Then came the pardons for
those charged with the January 6th insurrection. Critics rightfully
so warned that pardoning people who tried to influence an election outcome was
sending a message that political violence might be an excuse.
These are not isolated incidents.
In fact, there are many more, from church killings to the Charleston Emanuel
AME Church by a white supremacist, to the Tree of Life Synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh
again by a white supremacist. There have been 35 anti-Muslim attacks on Mosques
in California alone since 2005.
And here is the part that
many commentators are afraid to say: there really is no equivalent pattern on the
left. None. Sure, the left has had a few crazies, but the left is quick to condemn
such action and they certainly are not encouraging it. There are no left-wing movements
storming government buildings to stop constitutional processes. No President has
told left-wing militias to “stand down, but stand by”. There are no Black or Muslim
supremacists shooting up White churches. There is no left-aligned equivalent of
mass-casualty attacks on synagogues.
And if we are again going
to be honest, we have to acknowledge something else: this didn’t escalate in a vacuum.
Political violence intensified in the same years that Donald Trump became the
dominant force in American politics. That is not an accusation, but what the
timeline shows. In my view, the rhetoric he used, the way he labeled entire
groups as enemies, and the way he framed political opponents as threats to the
nation, have encouraged the environment where violence became more likely. I am
not saying that every supporter wanted this. I’m not saying every voter agreed
with the tone. But the truth is when a political leader repeatedly describes immigrants
as “invaders” and "criminals", journalists as “the enemy of the
people,” and political opponents as “dangerous,” it changes the temperature of
the country. It convinces a small but volatile minority that force might be
justified.
Saturday evening's
alleged assassination attempt doesn’t change that. If anything, it proves that
point: political violence grows when we refuse to confront it honestly. It
grows when we pretend the danger is two-sided. It grows when we let lies,
conspiracies, and intimidation become part of our political bloodstream.
I think that it is the President
and the party that controls Congress’s job to ensure the safety of not only the
American people, but every person that is currently on our soil. The Trump administration
and the Republicans in Congress have done nothing. Until all of our schools are
safe, all of our places of worship are safe, and all of our neighborhoods are
safe from racial violence, I don’t think any president has the right to put his
safety above the American people.
Very well written, totally what I and hopefully everyone should be thinking. We are not political enemies against each other but the current President chose to inflame the fuel of hatred. God be the witness and public be the jury, this is not how any country should be evolving into the future. Let there be change to this political atmosphere in November and rewrite history in the right direction.
ReplyDelete