Skip to main content

 

When Belief Turns into a Costume

There’s a strange thing happening in America, and you can feel it long before you try to explain it. It’s this gap — this canyon — between what people say they believe and what they’re actually willing to live by. And nowhere is that gap wider than with the two books Americans love to wave around: the Bible and the Constitution.

You see it at rallies, in church parking lots, on cable news, on bumper stickers. People hold these books up like trophies. They swear by them. They defend them. They quote the parts they like. But when those same books ask something difficult — something that cuts against anger, or pride, or loyalty to a political tribe — suddenly the meaning gets fuzzy. Suddenly, the text becomes “complicated.” Suddenly, the rules don’t apply. It’s not that people don’t know what these books say. It’s that they don’t want to be bound by them. And that’s how belief turns into a costume.

The Bible and the Constitution: Sacred Until They’re Inconvenient

Both texts demand something real. The Bible asks for humility, mercy, forgiveness, compassion, and restraint. The Constitution asks for accountability, honesty, and respect for the limits that keep this country from sliding into chaos. But a lot of folks treat both books like a buffet. They take the parts that feel good — the parts that flatter them or justify their anger — and leave the rest behind. They’ll quote Jesus about strength but skip the parts about loving your enemies. They’ll quote the Founders about freedom but skip the parts about responsibility. It’s not confusion. It’s convenience.

The Bible as a Prop

One moment from the last few years captured this perfectly: the Bible‑holding photo op in front of St. John’s Church. First, they had to clear away legal protestors. Then a very protected Trump marched across the street for a photo op. The Bible wasn’t opened. It wasn’t read. It wasn’t quoted. It was held up like a product in a commercial, as if he were selling cornflakes. When a reporter asked, “Is that your Bible?” the answer was, “It’s a Bible.” That moment wasn’t about faith. It was about the appearance of faith — the costume of belief without the substance. And millions of Christians defended it anyway, not because it honored the Bible because in truth it had nothing to do with the Bible, but because it honored their team.

The Jesus Imagery That Crossed a Line

But the clearest example — the one that still stops me in my tracks — is the wave of images showing Trump as Jesus. Not like Jesus. Not following Jesus. As Jesus. Crown of thorns. Heavenly glow. Shepherd imagery. Sacred‑heart style portraits. This is like the Golden Calf moment in the Bible. Critics didn’t create these. They were created by supporters, just like when Moses came down from the mountain. And Trump has shared some of them himself, not rejecting them as a true believer would, not correcting them, but amplifying them like a person who doesn’t believe would. When a political leader is portrayed as Jesus Christ, the central figure of Christianity, that’s not patriotism. That’s not devotion. That’s not even enthusiasm. That’s definitely not Christianity. That’s worship of a false idol. That is wanting to be worshiped as the Golden Calf. That is believing that you are that Golden Calf. And worship belongs to God — not politicians.

The Constitution as a Prop

The same pattern shows up with the Constitution. Trump has praised the Constitution in speeches, but he has also said Article II gives him “the right to do whatever I want as president.” He has called judges who ruled against him “enemies.” He has described lawful investigations as “treason,” even though treason has a specific constitutional definition. He has attacked officials who upheld constitutional processes as “traitors.” These are public statements anyone can look up. And again, millions of people who claim to revere the Constitution defended those statements — not because they fit the Constitution, but because they fit the leader. That’s not constitutionalism. That’s political idolatry.

Political Idolatry: When a Leader Replaces the Principles

There’s a word for what happens when people stop following principles and start following a person: idolatry. Political idolatry is when loyalty to a leader becomes more important than loyalty to truth, morality, or the Constitution. It’s when the leader becomes the source of right and wrong. It’s when criticism of the leader feels like a personal attack. It’s when the leader’s image replaces religious symbols, national symbols, or even moral symbols. At that point, it doesn’t matter what the Bible says. It doesn’t matter what the Constitution says. It only matters what the leader says. That’s not faith. That’s not patriotism.
That’s again worship of the Golden Calf. And worship of a political figure as that Golden Calf is the oldest warning sign in the book — literally.

The Oath Problem

Both Christians and public officials take oaths. Christians vow to follow Christ’s teachings.
Officials vow to “support and defend the Constitution.” But an oath only works if the person taking it intends to be bound by it. Otherwise, it’s just a performance — a costume. The Constitution fails for the same reason the Gospel fails: not because the text is weak, but because the people swearing allegiance to it don’t mean it.

The Moment of Truth

People reveal their real loyalty when the text contradicts their desires. Jesus says, “turn the other cheek,” but some cheer retaliation and unjust wars. Jesus says, “welcome the stranger,” but some cheer putting them in cages. The Constitution says “no one is above the law,” but some defend lawbreaking. The Constitution says “peaceful transfer of power,” but some excuse attempts to overturn it. The pattern is the same: The sacred text, whether the Bible or the Constitution, is revered until it becomes inconvenient. Then we turn our backs on it.

The Punch

At the end of the day, the Bible and the Constitution don’t fail us.
We fail them. Because it’s easy to wave a book in the air. It is easy to say we believe when you don’t know what it really says. It’s harder to read it and live by it. And if America ever wants to find its way again, we’re going to have to stop worshipping the people who break the rules — and start respecting the rules that protect the people. I have written many times that too many Christians have turned their backs on the teachings of Jesus. But we have to also admit that too many people have turned their backs on the Constitution and the freedom and liberties that it provides.  



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  There’s a simple way to judge a country: look at whose lives it protects, and whose lives it’s willing to forget. For years now, we’ve heard the phrase “All Lives Matter.” It sounds fair. It sounds equal. It sounds like common sense. But a country doesn’t reveal its values through slogans. It reveals them through actions, through the lives it defends, the lives it ignores, and the lives it quietly pushes out of sight. And lately, America has been doing a whole lot of looking away. When Black Americans said they were being killed during traffic stops and routine encounters, the response from many leaders wasn’t concern; it was irritation. Instead of saying, “Let’s fix the problem so fewer people die,” we heard “Blue Lives Matter,” “Stop resisting,” and “BLM is a terrorist group.” A man died in a chokehold on camera. We all saw, from the beginning to the end. It was like a modern-day lynching. Millions marched peacefully. The answer from those in power was “law and order,” and “...
  On Saturday, I was looking at Facebook and a person I was friends with, in fact, someone I went to High School with, posted something I knew was wrong. The post claimed that four lawmakers in Colorado decided jail time shouldn’t be mandatory for people who committed sexual assault of children. She claimed they were pedophile protectors. I opened up Perplexity and asked about the situation, and this is the reply I got back: You’re referring to a recent controversy in Colorado over a proposed bill that would change sentencing rules for certain sex crimes. Here are the verified facts to clarify what’s actually happening: • In early 2026, the Colorado House Judiciary Committee held a vote on a sentencing reform bill that aimed to give judges more discretion in certain felony cases. • Some lawmakers voted against an amendment that would have made mandatory prison sentences apply to all sex crimes, including child sexual assault, preferring instead to let judges determine sentences...
  Dove or hawk? Donald Trump ran for President promising to end “endless wars”, avoid new ones, and put American families first. He cast himself as an outsider who would bring peace – the only candidate who wouldn’t drag America into another conflict. The message worked because let's face it, after so many years in Iraq and Afghanistan, America was tired of war. As a country, we were all tired of War. The country wanted stability, not another generation of men and women sent into danger. But once in office, he governed very differently. He governed like a Hawk, quick to threaten, quick to escalate, and willing to use both bombs and tariffs as weapons. What was missing wasn’t just consistency. It was an honor: the sense of responsibility and restraint that should come with the power to risk other people's sons and daughters. This isn’t about ideology. It's about whether someone who promised peace, but repeatedly chooses confrontation, can still claim to be a “dove”. A core...