Skip to main content

 

Now as I continue on the journey to discover the right that people feel that they are losing or are under attack I go to right number 2 on the USA list. The Right to Bear Arms.  I am a gun owner,  in fact I own multiple guns.

The right to bear arms is part of the 2nd amendment to our constitution. In my opinion it is also the most misunderstood, twisted and politicized amendment to the Constitution.  A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.  This one simple sentence has been debated since it was written.

The first part of the sentence is that a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a Free State is one part of the amendment that has been mostly forgotten. Now our US military is a well regulated organization that is under the control of our Civilian Government headed by our Commander and Chief,  the President. So under that line of thinking any militia being necessary to the security of a Free State would also be under the control of the civilian government headed by the Governor of each State. Now I have to ask, when was the last time any governor of any state called for the formation of a militia. 

Nowhere in the amendment does it say that you have a right to bear arms to protect yourself. The courts have been much divided on this and in some cases have actually legislated from the bench. In many cases this comes down to personal belief and the belief of the community and the state. I do not believe that it is something that should be legislated by the bench. I do believe that I have the right to protect my family and property but that right was not given to me by the second amendment. The State and local governments is where I get that right and that is where it should stay, with the State and local governments. I do not think that gun control is a one of those one size fits all situations. It is ok to have different rules in Billings Montana than in New York city. It is ok to have different rules in Greenville Ohio than in Cleveland Ohio. What we don’t need is a bunch of self a appointed vigilantes running around with AR15s when the community does not want them there. We also don’t need a bunch of people shooting at police because they think of them as the enemy.

Now if you read up on the second amendment you will see that some of the framers of the Constitution feared that they needed to protect themselves from a central government that would disarm the people and do away with slavery. In some cases the slaves out numbered the slavers and they needed a militia to put down a slave rebellion. The economy of the South was cotton and that was a labor intensive crop, they needed slaves to maintain that economy. Now race and guns have gone hand-in-hand since the revolution. Slavery is over but the racism of the 2nd amendment is still there. To deny that is just being ignorant. When people say that they have to protect themselves I always wonder what color the person is they feel that they have to protect themselves from. When you say stand your ground what is the color of the person that you want to stand your ground?  Sometimes our prejudices get the best of us and we don’t really search within ourselves to really explore what the real problems are and what the real answers are.

The question was is our right to bear arms under threat?  I would say yes, but not from government legislation as much as the National Guard has made it a service that was no longer needed. Militias were always ineffective for our national protection and were replaced by the National Guard. There is no need to have a well regulated State Militia.Maybe it is time to get rid of the Second Admendment.

Now that does not mean we all should have our guns taken away and I don’t want mine taken away. I plan on to continue to hunt with my sons and grandchildren. I also plan to protect my home if I need to but I hope I never do. I do not feel I have to run around on the city streets trying to look like some tough patriot when I know that owning a gun may be my right it is not what gives me freedom.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  Tommy Tuberville made a comment about Biden eating an ice cream cone in New York City. He posted on X that “Hope @JoeBiden enjoyed going out for ice cream in NYC while the rest of the city is afraid of crime and migrants”. If Senator Tuberville was really an informed and knowledgeable lawmaker he would know that Alabama, the State that he represents in the Senate, has a murder rate that is three times the rate of New York City. I wonder if this is a case of another Republican lying and giving misinformation in an attempt to weaken our nation or is he just a politician that doesn’t have a clue to the real problems that face the nation and the State he is suppose to represent. Maybe it would help if Tuberville actually lived in the State he is supposed to represent. If you believe the Washington Post he actually lives in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida. I have been to Santa Rosa Beach and I have to admit it is beautiful there but that should not be an excuse for not living in the State you r
  If I was a parent of a handicapped or developmentally disabled child I would be very nervous right now. If I was a parent of a Gay or Tran’s child I would be very nervous. Why? I think that we have a person running for the office of President that thinks that it is ok to mock people with disabilities. President Biden is a stutterer and he has worked hard to overcome that disability. That should be something that should be an inspiration to not only people with disabilities but to the entire nation. He is a man that has risen above his stuttering to achieve remarkable things. By Trump mocking Biden because of his stuttering he is sending a message to the entire country it is ok to bully other people just because they are different or have a disability. Now Biden is a grown man that has had to endure bullying like that all his life and he has come out probably stronger because of it. Not everyone is as strong as Biden. Biden is not the first person that Trump has insulted because a h
  Trump’s oath of office, his lawyers are saying that Trump never took an oath to support the Constitution. Why would his lawyers say this? The reason is because the Presidential oath of office does not have the word “Support” in it. The Presidential oath uses the words “Preserve, Protect, and Defend” the Constitution. Why would the Presidential oath not use the word support? Could it be that the President is held to a higher standard than just support the Constitution? I have read that is the reason why that the words “Preserve, Protect and Defend” are used is to show the greater responsibility the President has to the Constitution. I think Trump’s lawyers want us to believe that Trump had less of a responsibility to our Constitution because the word “Support” is not in his oath. I think just the opposite; he had a stronger responsibility and failed at that responsibility, badly. Maybe that is because he never read the Constitution of the United States. Trump’s lawyers also say Sect