Skip to main content

 

Rewriting history get a lot of attention and press. What most people don’t realize is, that is, what is supposed to happen. As our knowledge evolves on a certain subject in history so will how it is written. I once told a friend at breakfast that no matter how hard you try to spin history, history will eventually get it right. It may take time but eventually the politicians must give way to the actual historians. 

Let’s take the Civil War as one example. In many ways past history has tried to paint the Southern cause as a noble cause. The South wanted to preserve their way of life. The South wanted to preserve their economic system. It makes it seem like the war was fought for very noble causes by very noble men. We are not about 160 years away from that war and there have been many arguments on what the war was actually fought over. Yes, the Civil War was fought to persevere the South’s economic system that unfortunately was based on one crop, cotton. It was a very labor intensive crop that took a lot of slaves to harvest. When you say it was fought to preserve their economic system and not include the phrase based on slavery you are omitting a very important part of history. The “heroes of the South” were slave owners. So are people that enslave a race really heroes? I really do not think that this is a list that you want to be on. Some of the names will surprise you, they did me. It was interesting to see that some slave owners freed their slaves and became abolitionist. During the Civil War it even effected the economies of other countries. In Manchester England the textile workers would not touch a bale of American slaved picked cotton even though it led to may financial hardships. The so called “heroes of the South” should be remembered in history as they really were and history is actually catching up with them.

Most every morning I start my day reading what Heather Cox Richardson has to say on Facebook.  She is a history professor from Boston College and posts an article pretty much every day. She has about a million and a half followers and if you haven’t read something from her I can only encourage you to do so. Yesterday’s posting was the letter that Mitch McConnell and 36 other Republicans sent to the Education Secretary accusing him of advancing a politicized and divisive agenda in the teaching of American History. Now history has always been tried to be written by politicians. When politicians try to write history all they are really doing is writing propaganda. Just look at Hitler  They seem to be more interested in hiding the truth than they are of learning from it. Trump formed a commission of right-wing activists to write The 1776 Report. There were not historians.  History should not be something for us to create national pride. History is something we must learn from. There was a politician that actually wanted the schools to teach the good part of slavery.  Like there is a good part of slavery?  It is an embarrassing moment in American History and by white washing can do nothing but divide us more. We should not be hiding from our past. We should be learning from our past and taking pride in our accomplishments. The more diverse we become and the more inclusive we become the prouder everyone can be in this country.

As we move forward history will be harder and harder to rewrite. In today’s digital age a person does not even have to leave their easy chair to find the answers too many of histories questions. Ron Johnson form Wisconsin tries to spin the events of Jan 6th. Ron there is way too much digital evidence. There were just too many people watching it live on TV. To try to spin it differently just makes you look like an idiot. In today’s digital everything will be there for generations to see and study. All the lies, all the insults, all the violence. It will all be there. This blog could even survive and be studied. Who knows?  I wish that I could come back 150 years from now and see what the real historians will have to say about the early 2100’s.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  Tommy Tuberville made a comment about Biden eating an ice cream cone in New York City. He posted on X that “Hope @JoeBiden enjoyed going out for ice cream in NYC while the rest of the city is afraid of crime and migrants”. If Senator Tuberville was really an informed and knowledgeable lawmaker he would know that Alabama, the State that he represents in the Senate, has a murder rate that is three times the rate of New York City. I wonder if this is a case of another Republican lying and giving misinformation in an attempt to weaken our nation or is he just a politician that doesn’t have a clue to the real problems that face the nation and the State he is suppose to represent. Maybe it would help if Tuberville actually lived in the State he is supposed to represent. If you believe the Washington Post he actually lives in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida. I have been to Santa Rosa Beach and I have to admit it is beautiful there but that should not be an excuse for not living in the State you r
  If I was a parent of a handicapped or developmentally disabled child I would be very nervous right now. If I was a parent of a Gay or Tran’s child I would be very nervous. Why? I think that we have a person running for the office of President that thinks that it is ok to mock people with disabilities. President Biden is a stutterer and he has worked hard to overcome that disability. That should be something that should be an inspiration to not only people with disabilities but to the entire nation. He is a man that has risen above his stuttering to achieve remarkable things. By Trump mocking Biden because of his stuttering he is sending a message to the entire country it is ok to bully other people just because they are different or have a disability. Now Biden is a grown man that has had to endure bullying like that all his life and he has come out probably stronger because of it. Not everyone is as strong as Biden. Biden is not the first person that Trump has insulted because a h
  Trump’s oath of office, his lawyers are saying that Trump never took an oath to support the Constitution. Why would his lawyers say this? The reason is because the Presidential oath of office does not have the word “Support” in it. The Presidential oath uses the words “Preserve, Protect, and Defend” the Constitution. Why would the Presidential oath not use the word support? Could it be that the President is held to a higher standard than just support the Constitution? I have read that is the reason why that the words “Preserve, Protect and Defend” are used is to show the greater responsibility the President has to the Constitution. I think Trump’s lawyers want us to believe that Trump had less of a responsibility to our Constitution because the word “Support” is not in his oath. I think just the opposite; he had a stronger responsibility and failed at that responsibility, badly. Maybe that is because he never read the Constitution of the United States. Trump’s lawyers also say Sect