Skip to main content

Here I am at the end of July 2021 and we are still arguing about wearing masks.  We have been given all kinds of information on a daily basis that is always changing. I remember they said that if we could get over 70 percent of population we may be able to reach herd immunity. I never thought that we would get to herd immunity. With all the resistance to even the virus itself, I knew it we would never reach our goal. When you have people dying and some of their last statements is I thought it was a hoax you have a definite communication and trust problem.

Being from Florida I have never stopped wearing my mask where I thought it was appropriate. They have said all along that the vaccine would not stop me from getting the virus. They only said that if I did catch the virus that I would not get as sick and probably would not die. They did not say that we were immune. With that in mind I continued to wear my mask to the grocery store and other shopping places. I will tell you right now that I am in one of those vulnerable categories. I have heart disease and I have scarring on my lungs from exposure to asbestos. I am also 68 years old. I got vaccinated as soon as it was made available to me which as you know in Florida it was like jumping through hoops. I knew that it would not stop me from getting Covid-19 but I also knew that it may save my life. Just because something may not kill me know does not mean I shouldn’t protect myself from catching it. Also, If I do catch it, I could still spread it to other people vaccinated and unvaccinated. The vaccine helps and everyone should get it but it is not the cure-all. It is not what is going to wipe out the virus for good. That may never come, we don’t know but science will still keep on researching  it.

I was just watching a video of some Republican members of Congress marching in protest because they are now suppose to wear masks again. What an example they are setting for the rest of the country. Masks can help and they definitely do not hurt. What possible harm can the mask cause? The truth is that they don’t cause any harm. Why do Republican Members of Congress want to send such a divisive message? I am an independent voter that will not vote for any Republican that wants to divide the country let alone divide the country over the wearing of a mask that may save my life or my neighbors. Life, liberty and justice for all. Life is the first part of that statement so without life we cannot have liberty or justice.

The personal choice argument is all wet too. How can you say that you are pro life and anti mask. How can you say that it is my choice and then deny a women her choice? You can say what about the life on the baby and I can say what about the life of the person standing next to you. If you do not hold dear the life of the person next to you do you really care about that fetus?

In the next month most of the schools start across the country. I know that there is going to be a huge argument about masks. Governor DeSantis is already stating that there will be no masks for children in schools because children have to breathe. That is an interesting choice of word. Children have to able to breathe. Dead Children do not breathe at all Governor. There may be children that die because he says that children have to breathe. There may be children that spread it to their parent, grandparents and siblings because he says that children have to breathe. What is the acceptable number of deaths? 10, 100, 1000? How many deaths does it take for it to be appropreate to wear a mask because children have to breathe. Dead people do not breathe at all.

As a country we have to unite in protecting one another. What amazes me the most is that this is not the message of the church. I always thought that was what Jesus wanted us to do, look out for your neighbor. I would be willing to bet that there are a lot of people that think just like me.  There lies the problem. We are not suppose to think. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  There’s a simple way to judge a country: look at whose lives it protects, and whose lives it’s willing to forget. For years now, we’ve heard the phrase “All Lives Matter.” It sounds fair. It sounds equal. It sounds like common sense. But a country doesn’t reveal its values through slogans. It reveals them through actions, through the lives it defends, the lives it ignores, and the lives it quietly pushes out of sight. And lately, America has been doing a whole lot of looking away. When Black Americans said they were being killed during traffic stops and routine encounters, the response from many leaders wasn’t concern; it was irritation. Instead of saying, “Let’s fix the problem so fewer people die,” we heard “Blue Lives Matter,” “Stop resisting,” and “BLM is a terrorist group.” A man died in a chokehold on camera. We all saw, from the beginning to the end. It was like a modern-day lynching. Millions marched peacefully. The answer from those in power was “law and order,” and “...
  On Saturday, I was looking at Facebook and a person I was friends with, in fact, someone I went to High School with, posted something I knew was wrong. The post claimed that four lawmakers in Colorado decided jail time shouldn’t be mandatory for people who committed sexual assault of children. She claimed they were pedophile protectors. I opened up Perplexity and asked about the situation, and this is the reply I got back: You’re referring to a recent controversy in Colorado over a proposed bill that would change sentencing rules for certain sex crimes. Here are the verified facts to clarify what’s actually happening: • In early 2026, the Colorado House Judiciary Committee held a vote on a sentencing reform bill that aimed to give judges more discretion in certain felony cases. • Some lawmakers voted against an amendment that would have made mandatory prison sentences apply to all sex crimes, including child sexual assault, preferring instead to let judges determine sentences...
  Dove or hawk? Donald Trump ran for President promising to end “endless wars”, avoid new ones, and put American families first. He cast himself as an outsider who would bring peace – the only candidate who wouldn’t drag America into another conflict. The message worked because let's face it, after so many years in Iraq and Afghanistan, America was tired of war. As a country, we were all tired of War. The country wanted stability, not another generation of men and women sent into danger. But once in office, he governed very differently. He governed like a Hawk, quick to threaten, quick to escalate, and willing to use both bombs and tariffs as weapons. What was missing wasn’t just consistency. It was an honor: the sense of responsibility and restraint that should come with the power to risk other people's sons and daughters. This isn’t about ideology. It's about whether someone who promised peace, but repeatedly chooses confrontation, can still claim to be a “dove”. A core...