Skip to main content

 

It is frustrating that voter suppression is still a problem in America. Having lived through the 60s and the civil rights movement and to see that we are returning to or have already returned to those days is heartbreaking. The great principle of “one voice, one vote” is not longer true. We even have the Supreme Court trying to tell us that their support of not supporting voter rights is not political like we are to believe that there is something that it in the Constitution which makes is ok to suppress voting. When the very tool that is supposes to protect our democracy is the tool that is being used to diminish our democracy we have a real problem.

Clarence Thomas has tried to convince the people that when he writes an opinion while sitting on the Supreme Court it is not a political opinion. I for one wish that was true but I for one know that is a lie. Yes, I do believe that a Supreme Court Justice can lie. Being a Conservative Judge in the first place is being part of a political movement. Now we do have Justices that they say are liberal. Being liberal is not a political movement. Being liberal is everything that is not part of the conservative movement today. Free thinking is now considered liberal. Wanting to save children’s lives has been called being a liberal. Wanting to improve education has been called liberal. Wanting good roads have been called liberal. Wanting to improve healthcare is called liberal. Just wanting to improve the standard of living for most people is called liberal. I have been called a libtard because of what I write and to be honest with you most of my political thinking comes from the being raised in a Republican household in the 50s. In reality we have conservatives and then everyone else. Those everyone else are now called liberals.

Voter suppression and racism has always gone hand in hand since the end of the Civil War. The Supreme Court has slowly stripped the Civil Rights Act from the 60s to almost the point is that we are back to where we started from. They have upheld voter suppression laws on Arizona and I also believe in Texas. The organization that should be all about protecting our rights is now a tool that helps take them away. Our vote is part of our voice. Our voice should be protected under the 1st amendment.  Voter suppression is meant to silence that voice. If I can think of that so can a Supreme Court Justice like Clarence Thomas. The Nazis used the courts to suppress people and to eliminate political opponents. When you have a political ideology running the courts that helps one political party suppress people then democracy is going to fail. If we keep going in the direction that we are going in our democracy is going to fail too.  

Gerrymandering is another popular way for one political party to suppress the vote and to help rig elections in their favor. Both parties have practiced gerrymandering but it is way more common in the Republicans than the Democrats. You draw district lines so that the minority gets the majority of the elected seats. That is what I would call cheating no matter who did it. This was brought to the Supreme Court and they wouldn’t ever hear it. The fact that a political party is trying to silence peoples votes and they would not even look at it. Our vote is part of our voice and the Supreme Court thought that it was not in their scope to protect my voice. In my opinion in reality they were saying the my voice was not protected under the 1st amendment. If my voice is not protected then whose is?

Are we heading to a situation where we have minority rule in the United States? I find the thought of that scary. We have already seen children put into cages. We have already seen people killed for just who they voted for. We have already seen the sterilization of immigrant women. We have witnessed a police execution. I have to wonder what kind of nation we are becoming. Maybe we should be giving that statue back to France because we no longer believe in what it represents.

Comments

  1. i refuse to use the term "Conservatives" to describe those on the Right... they are Regressives.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  Tommy Tuberville made a comment about Biden eating an ice cream cone in New York City. He posted on X that “Hope @JoeBiden enjoyed going out for ice cream in NYC while the rest of the city is afraid of crime and migrants”. If Senator Tuberville was really an informed and knowledgeable lawmaker he would know that Alabama, the State that he represents in the Senate, has a murder rate that is three times the rate of New York City. I wonder if this is a case of another Republican lying and giving misinformation in an attempt to weaken our nation or is he just a politician that doesn’t have a clue to the real problems that face the nation and the State he is suppose to represent. Maybe it would help if Tuberville actually lived in the State he is supposed to represent. If you believe the Washington Post he actually lives in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida. I have been to Santa Rosa Beach and I have to admit it is beautiful there but that should not be an excuse for not living in the State you r
  If I was a parent of a handicapped or developmentally disabled child I would be very nervous right now. If I was a parent of a Gay or Tran’s child I would be very nervous. Why? I think that we have a person running for the office of President that thinks that it is ok to mock people with disabilities. President Biden is a stutterer and he has worked hard to overcome that disability. That should be something that should be an inspiration to not only people with disabilities but to the entire nation. He is a man that has risen above his stuttering to achieve remarkable things. By Trump mocking Biden because of his stuttering he is sending a message to the entire country it is ok to bully other people just because they are different or have a disability. Now Biden is a grown man that has had to endure bullying like that all his life and he has come out probably stronger because of it. Not everyone is as strong as Biden. Biden is not the first person that Trump has insulted because a h
  Trump’s oath of office, his lawyers are saying that Trump never took an oath to support the Constitution. Why would his lawyers say this? The reason is because the Presidential oath of office does not have the word “Support” in it. The Presidential oath uses the words “Preserve, Protect, and Defend” the Constitution. Why would the Presidential oath not use the word support? Could it be that the President is held to a higher standard than just support the Constitution? I have read that is the reason why that the words “Preserve, Protect and Defend” are used is to show the greater responsibility the President has to the Constitution. I think Trump’s lawyers want us to believe that Trump had less of a responsibility to our Constitution because the word “Support” is not in his oath. I think just the opposite; he had a stronger responsibility and failed at that responsibility, badly. Maybe that is because he never read the Constitution of the United States. Trump’s lawyers also say Sect