Skip to main content

 

It is frustrating that voter suppression is still a problem in America. Having lived through the 60s and the civil rights movement and to see that we are returning to or have already returned to those days is heartbreaking. The great principle of “one voice, one vote” is not longer true. We even have the Supreme Court trying to tell us that their support of not supporting voter rights is not political like we are to believe that there is something that it in the Constitution which makes is ok to suppress voting. When the very tool that is supposes to protect our democracy is the tool that is being used to diminish our democracy we have a real problem.

Clarence Thomas has tried to convince the people that when he writes an opinion while sitting on the Supreme Court it is not a political opinion. I for one wish that was true but I for one know that is a lie. Yes, I do believe that a Supreme Court Justice can lie. Being a Conservative Judge in the first place is being part of a political movement. Now we do have Justices that they say are liberal. Being liberal is not a political movement. Being liberal is everything that is not part of the conservative movement today. Free thinking is now considered liberal. Wanting to save children’s lives has been called being a liberal. Wanting to improve education has been called liberal. Wanting good roads have been called liberal. Wanting to improve healthcare is called liberal. Just wanting to improve the standard of living for most people is called liberal. I have been called a libtard because of what I write and to be honest with you most of my political thinking comes from the being raised in a Republican household in the 50s. In reality we have conservatives and then everyone else. Those everyone else are now called liberals.

Voter suppression and racism has always gone hand in hand since the end of the Civil War. The Supreme Court has slowly stripped the Civil Rights Act from the 60s to almost the point is that we are back to where we started from. They have upheld voter suppression laws on Arizona and I also believe in Texas. The organization that should be all about protecting our rights is now a tool that helps take them away. Our vote is part of our voice. Our voice should be protected under the 1st amendment.  Voter suppression is meant to silence that voice. If I can think of that so can a Supreme Court Justice like Clarence Thomas. The Nazis used the courts to suppress people and to eliminate political opponents. When you have a political ideology running the courts that helps one political party suppress people then democracy is going to fail. If we keep going in the direction that we are going in our democracy is going to fail too.  

Gerrymandering is another popular way for one political party to suppress the vote and to help rig elections in their favor. Both parties have practiced gerrymandering but it is way more common in the Republicans than the Democrats. You draw district lines so that the minority gets the majority of the elected seats. That is what I would call cheating no matter who did it. This was brought to the Supreme Court and they wouldn’t ever hear it. The fact that a political party is trying to silence peoples votes and they would not even look at it. Our vote is part of our voice and the Supreme Court thought that it was not in their scope to protect my voice. In my opinion in reality they were saying the my voice was not protected under the 1st amendment. If my voice is not protected then whose is?

Are we heading to a situation where we have minority rule in the United States? I find the thought of that scary. We have already seen children put into cages. We have already seen people killed for just who they voted for. We have already seen the sterilization of immigrant women. We have witnessed a police execution. I have to wonder what kind of nation we are becoming. Maybe we should be giving that statue back to France because we no longer believe in what it represents.

Comments

  1. i refuse to use the term "Conservatives" to describe those on the Right... they are Regressives.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  In 1776 we declared our independence against a Monarch that was above the law. I wonder what John Adams would think about what the Supreme Court just ruled. I believe, what the Supreme Court just ruled is contrary to what the intention of the men that wrote and approved our Declaration of Independence.   This Fourth of July it would be a good idea if everyone would start out by reading the Declaration of Independence. The words that always have always stuck with me are “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Do those words still hold true? The three branches of the Government get their just powers from the people. Not the rich people. Not the Republicans. Not the Democrats. It is...
This is my continued search on whether Trump has the Character to be President. A person I know stated “His character matters bc it is in the character I believe he has the leadership, knowledge, wisdom, experience, compassion, integrity that will lead us on the path towards a more safe, secure, healthy, prosperous, free world than the direction we are headed.” My last blog looked at his character as integrity from a legal standpoint before he even was elected President. From a legal standpoint there is no way I would have thought he had the integrity to be President. Now I will look at some of his Moral Integrity and Compassion that should be there from the man that sits in the White House.  I have to say something about Donald Trump, he sure is a believer in the institution of marriage. He likes marriage so much that he has said “I do” three times. What his problem with marriage is the actual vow that he has to take. You know that love, honor, and cherish until death do us part. ...
  It is a new game but it is still being played just like the old one. Biden has chosen not to run for a 2 nd term and it looks like Kamala Harris will get the Democratic nomination. This drastically changes what the election will look like. Instead of two old white guys facing one another we will have a woman that is 19 years younger than the Republican nominee Donald Trump. Donald Trump went from saying Biden was too old and senile even though he was only three years younger than Biden to the old guy that appears to be too old and senile. Since Biden’s debate performance he had been under a considerable amount of pressure to drop out of the race. I have admitted in a past post when Biden came on stage he looked frail and in the beginning of the debate Trump’s tactics really confused Biden. He did get better as the debate went on but it was too late for that. The first 5 minutes was all that anyone remembered. Trump used a debating technique that is called “Gish Gallop” where a...