Skip to main content

 

I used to think that there really was not much of a difference between the two political parties, the Republicans and the Democrats. I thought they differed on some things but mostly just listened to different lobbyists. I thought that basically they were all a little bit corrupt with their hands in the cookie jar. Well, their hands may be all in the cookie jar but what they believe in now is very different. I feel there is a distinct difference between the two parties that has grown since Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America”. Maybe the differences were always there but I just didn’t notice them as much until Newt but because I had always voted Republican. I do believe that was one of the major changing points that drove me away from the Republican Party.

A person that I follow on Twitter, George, posted what he believed the Democrats stood for and what the Republicans didn’t. The first thing on George’s list is healthcare. Healthcare does seem to be a one party issue. The Democrats are for affordable healthcare and the Republicans always seem to vote against it. Now what is wrong with people having healthcare? Better put, what is wrong with poor people having healthcare? Canada have nationalized healthcare and they are still a free market country. Most if not all of Europe has nationalize healthcare and they are free market countries. The United States? Nope. We are suppose to be a great Christian nation and to me there is something really immoral with people getting rich off of other people’s suffering. Worse is letting people suffer just because they do not have insurance. Who are the people that suffer the most? The poor of course. The very group that we should be helping. The funny thing is that most of the countries that have nationalized healthcare are actually freer than we are. Don’t take my word for it. Look it up.

The second thing is quality education. Our public educational system is constantly under attack in the United States. For profit education is what I feel the Republican Party wants. To me, I look at it as socialism for private education which favors the more affluent. Every dollar that is taken away from our public schools and given to the private sector just hurts the poor in the this country more and more. Instead of using education to lift people out of poverty it seems like there are people that want to keep them in poverty. They look at the poor and under educated and say that it isn’t their problem. I think as time goes by it will more and more be everyone’s problem. The biggest difference between a developed country and an undeveloped country is education. An uneducated public is also a dangerous public that is easily manipulated by someone like Trump. It is important that we study about the Holocaust and that we study about the evils of slavery. Whitewashing history is dangerous and will lead to history repeating itself.

The third thing is equal justice. We are told that there is no systematic racism in the United States. Who tells us that? Well Tim Scott and the Republican Party, I beg to differ. We have black women that votes by mistake and it truly was a mistake and she is sentenced to 5 years in prison. We have a son of a Governor that was 17 and he not only tried to voted illegally once but he tried to voted illegally twice.  I am not saying that I would want that 17 year old to be out in prison for 5 years but the kid did know what he was doing and there should be some sort of punishment. My point is that the black woman should not have been sentenced for 5 years for voting by mistake. She didn’t know she was breaking the law and he did. Where is the equal justice? You have people that stormed the Capitol in an effort to change our election and they just get house arrest for trespassing. I have heard it said that justice is blind well I beg to differ because I believe that justice does see the color of a man’s or woman’s skin.

The fourth thing on his list is affordable housing. I live in Ft. Myers Florida which is experiencing a great deal of growth. With growth you need workers. With workers you need housing. It is a simple concept but one that is really ignored. Democrats talk about affordable housing but Republicans don’t and it is a problem that affects both the employer and the employee. You cannot expect people to live in shacks and work for next to nothing. People need fair wages and affordable housing period. There has to be more planning by both the Local, State and Federal levels to handle the housing crisis in this country.

The fifth thing on his list is clean water. This one should be a no brainer but for some reason it is not. Why? Because it is part of the infrastructure that has been so badly ignored. Issues like what happened in Flint, Michigan should never have happened. There is multiple reason but the argument I always thought was interesting was the one that we couldn’t afford it. Of course you can’t afford anything when you cut taxes. A lot of the deficit that has been created in my opinion was not from spending but from cutting taxes. Trickledown economics was a lie that was sold to the American people and future generations will be stuck paying for that lie.

The sixth thing on his list which was really the first on George’s list is voter suppression. The reason I put is last is because it is the most important thing. Why do you suppress voters? So you can deny healthcare. So you can suppress education. So equal justice will never happen. So there is no affordable housing. So there is no improvement of our infrastructure. You deny groups of people to vote so you can keep them in poverty and then blame them for their poverty. It is all about power. That is why there can be no bipartisanship between the Republican and Democrats. Not that the Democrats vision is so great it is because the Republican’s vision is one that only envisions greed and power. Of course this is just my opinion and I could be wrong.

 

After 50 rioters sentenced for January 6 insurrection, a debate rages over what justice looks like - CNNPolitics

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  Tommy Tuberville made a comment about Biden eating an ice cream cone in New York City. He posted on X that “Hope @JoeBiden enjoyed going out for ice cream in NYC while the rest of the city is afraid of crime and migrants”. If Senator Tuberville was really an informed and knowledgeable lawmaker he would know that Alabama, the State that he represents in the Senate, has a murder rate that is three times the rate of New York City. I wonder if this is a case of another Republican lying and giving misinformation in an attempt to weaken our nation or is he just a politician that doesn’t have a clue to the real problems that face the nation and the State he is suppose to represent. Maybe it would help if Tuberville actually lived in the State he is supposed to represent. If you believe the Washington Post he actually lives in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida. I have been to Santa Rosa Beach and I have to admit it is beautiful there but that should not be an excuse for not living in the State you r
  If I was a parent of a handicapped or developmentally disabled child I would be very nervous right now. If I was a parent of a Gay or Tran’s child I would be very nervous. Why? I think that we have a person running for the office of President that thinks that it is ok to mock people with disabilities. President Biden is a stutterer and he has worked hard to overcome that disability. That should be something that should be an inspiration to not only people with disabilities but to the entire nation. He is a man that has risen above his stuttering to achieve remarkable things. By Trump mocking Biden because of his stuttering he is sending a message to the entire country it is ok to bully other people just because they are different or have a disability. Now Biden is a grown man that has had to endure bullying like that all his life and he has come out probably stronger because of it. Not everyone is as strong as Biden. Biden is not the first person that Trump has insulted because a h
  Trump’s oath of office, his lawyers are saying that Trump never took an oath to support the Constitution. Why would his lawyers say this? The reason is because the Presidential oath of office does not have the word “Support” in it. The Presidential oath uses the words “Preserve, Protect, and Defend” the Constitution. Why would the Presidential oath not use the word support? Could it be that the President is held to a higher standard than just support the Constitution? I have read that is the reason why that the words “Preserve, Protect and Defend” are used is to show the greater responsibility the President has to the Constitution. I think Trump’s lawyers want us to believe that Trump had less of a responsibility to our Constitution because the word “Support” is not in his oath. I think just the opposite; he had a stronger responsibility and failed at that responsibility, badly. Maybe that is because he never read the Constitution of the United States. Trump’s lawyers also say Sect