Skip to main content

 

Guns, guns, guns. Every day, in just about every newspaper in America we can read about a shooting nearby. In 2020 there were over 19,000 homicides and over 24,000 suicides by guns. I have heard many times “Guns don’t kill people. People kill people”. Well, I would like to add that in most if not all cases it is people with guns that kill people and to say otherwise is just ignoring the facts. A gun does not pull its own trigger; a person has to pull that trigger.

As of 2020, the top ten gun ownership states per capita five were also in the top ten gun deaths per capita. I don’t know about you but I think that might say that more guns lead to more gun deaths. Funny but you hear about Chicago and Detroit being so violent but neither Illinois nor Michigan are in the top ten in either category. Don’t get me wrong, I think all our inner cities are violent places but maybe because they are in major news centers we hear about the gun violence more. But don’t kid yourself, gun violence is everywhere.  

I always hear it is our Constitutional right to bear arms given to us by our 2nd Amendment.  “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”  That one sentence has always been a very controversial sentence. All you ever hear people say, “In the Constitution, I have the right to bear arms” yet, that the one sentence says a lot more. The words well-regulated are in there. What does that mean? People running around with their AR-15’s, strapped on to go to the grocery store does not look like anything that is part of a well-regulated anything. It says, “being necessary for a Free State”. What does that mean? Without that 45 strapped to my side our State cannot be a free state? I am a gun owner and I have always thought that I had the right to protect my home and family. I never felt that it was the 2nd Amendment that gave me that right.

There have been always a racial side of the second amendment. Why was the second amendment put there in the first place when the Constitution established a Federal Army even during peacetime? During the Revolutionary War Militias prove not to be very effective. Why were the States so certain that they needed a well regulated Militia? How about 1. Attacks from Native Americans and 2. Slave uprisings. James Madison Patrick Henry and George Mason were very responsible for the 2nd Amendment because they did not trust that the Federal Government would react properly in case of a slave revolt. Because of a slave uprising known as the Haitian Revolution in 1791 many feared that the same would happen here. Many felt that a militia, controlled by the State, was very important for the maintaining of slavery in the South. In much of the South during slavery they had a type of local militia called slave patrols which were meant to enforce the laws of slavery. These early local Militia, some feel, are the precursors to our current police force. That was the original purpose for the 2nd Amendment as I see it.

In the ruling by the Supreme Court in 1874, the case United States  vs. Cruikshank,  the Supreme Court ruled that “The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument of its existence. The Second Amendment means no more than it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government.” You would think that this was a victory for gun control on the State level but at the time it opened the door for open season on the Blacks in our Southern States. We also had a few years later in 1886 Presser  vs. the State of Illinois. Illinois had passed a law against locally formed militias not sanctioned by the State. That law was upheld by the Supreme Court so now a militia had to follow the laws of the State. The non-sanctioned militias were illegal. The Supreme Court In The District of Columbia vs. Heller in 2008 stated that personal protection is part of the 2nd Amendment. It opened the door for all this open carry and gun intimidation that we have today. In 230 years that was never the purpose of the 2nd Amendment but it is now. So in my opinion it threw out 230 yrs of rulings for political gain. I wonder how many children would be alive today if the courts had ruled as courts in the past did?

The Second Amendment, is in my opinion, the most twisted sentence in the entire Constitution. It  was put there as a tool for the oppressor to help enslave and control Black people. The word self-protection is nowhere in the Amendment because the Amendment was not written for self-protection  as we know it today. The playing of politics has distorted it for political power and money. It was written for White slave owners to protect their investment in human flesh. It has been turned now into something very dangerous for our whole nation.

Sources worth reading:

Gun Violence Statistics in the United States in Charts and Graphs | Reader's Digest (rd.com)

The Second Amendment - Definition, Text & Rights - HISTORY

Historian Carol Anderson Uncovers The Racist Roots Of The 2nd Amendment : NPR

Slave patrol - Wikipedia

United States v. Cruikshank | The First Amendment Encyclopedia (mtsu.edu)

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  There’s a simple way to judge a country: look at whose lives it protects, and whose lives it’s willing to forget. For years now, we’ve heard the phrase “All Lives Matter.” It sounds fair. It sounds equal. It sounds like common sense. But a country doesn’t reveal its values through slogans. It reveals them through actions, through the lives it defends, the lives it ignores, and the lives it quietly pushes out of sight. And lately, America has been doing a whole lot of looking away. When Black Americans said they were being killed during traffic stops and routine encounters, the response from many leaders wasn’t concern; it was irritation. Instead of saying, “Let’s fix the problem so fewer people die,” we heard “Blue Lives Matter,” “Stop resisting,” and “BLM is a terrorist group.” A man died in a chokehold on camera. We all saw, from the beginning to the end. It was like a modern-day lynching. Millions marched peacefully. The answer from those in power was “law and order,” and “...
Post a Comment
Read more
  On Saturday, I was looking at Facebook and a person I was friends with, in fact, someone I went to High School with, posted something I knew was wrong. The post claimed that four lawmakers in Colorado decided jail time shouldn’t be mandatory for people who committed sexual assault of children. She claimed they were pedophile protectors. I opened up Perplexity and asked about the situation, and this is the reply I got back: You’re referring to a recent controversy in Colorado over a proposed bill that would change sentencing rules for certain sex crimes. Here are the verified facts to clarify what’s actually happening: • In early 2026, the Colorado House Judiciary Committee held a vote on a sentencing reform bill that aimed to give judges more discretion in certain felony cases. • Some lawmakers voted against an amendment that would have made mandatory prison sentences apply to all sex crimes, including child sexual assault, preferring instead to let judges determine sentences...
4 comments
Read more
  Dove or hawk? Donald Trump ran for President promising to end “endless wars”, avoid new ones, and put American families first. He cast himself as an outsider who would bring peace – the only candidate who wouldn’t drag America into another conflict. The message worked because let's face it, after so many years in Iraq and Afghanistan, America was tired of war. As a country, we were all tired of War. The country wanted stability, not another generation of men and women sent into danger. But once in office, he governed very differently. He governed like a Hawk, quick to threaten, quick to escalate, and willing to use both bombs and tariffs as weapons. What was missing wasn’t just consistency. It was an honor: the sense of responsibility and restraint that should come with the power to risk other people's sons and daughters. This isn’t about ideology. It's about whether someone who promised peace, but repeatedly chooses confrontation, can still claim to be a “dove”. A core...
2 comments
Read more