Skip to main content

 

There is pornography in our school libraries here in Florida. That is at least what one school board member is saying. She stated that she personally has found 75 books that she thinks should be banned. They have formed an emergency committee because of the urgency of the situation because school starts right around the corner. Do I think that there is pornography in schools libraries? Nope I don’t. Are there books that may make one think about many of the wrongs of this world? I hope so. Are there books that might help a child to know the dangers of the world around them? There better be or we are not trying to educate our children.

Just because you find a topic offensive does not make it pornography. “Debbie Does Dallas” is pornography, not that I ever read the book. The “Scarlet Letter” is not. There are many things in life that happen that may be offensive to you but that does not mean they should be banned from the library. If anything a library seems to be the perfect place to research things that we are not able to talk with our parents about. That is the purpose of a library. In today’s digital age trying to control what a child is reading on the web is almost impossible.  Just go and google.com and type in xxx and see if safe search has been turned off on your child’s computer. I also would be willing to bet that a lot of children will know how to turn safe search off and can view just about anything they want but let’s go ahead and attack our libraries. That the easy way to not have to deal with the real problems that our children are going to experience.  

One of the books that the article I read was about a book called “Lucky” by Alice Sebold. It is a book about an eighteen old college freshman that was brutally raped and her journey of recovery and assisting in her attackers arrest and conviction. At first thought you may say that this is a terrible book and high school children should not be able to read material like this. Well, I am going to tell you that I think that you are completely wrong. The second book is about a migrant child living is Washington and the struggles that he experiences along the way. Yes there is abuse again in this book also but then maybe we need to be communicating the real world to these children in our schools. There are statistics that show that 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys are a victim of child sexual abuse. 20 percent of adult females and 5 – 10 percent of adult males recall a childhood sexual assault or sexual abuse incident. During a one-year period in the US 16 percent of youths ages 14 to 17 had been sexually victimized. Children it is said are the most vulnerable between the ages of 7 to 13.

Our educational system should be more than just learning our ABCs or reading how Dick sees Jane run. We should not be hiding what the real world is going to bring to many of these children. Banning books is not protecting our children. Children need the resources to know that it is not their fault and that they are not alone. Libraries can help in that discovery. Bad things have always been out there and we need to be doing a better job preparing our children for those bad things and not ignoring them. Ignoring them just makes many children just an easy target. Is it the school’s job to do that? Many will tell you no. I agree that it is not their job to prepare your children but it is also not their job to hide that it is out there and our children need to be aware and protective of each other.

Sex is all around us. Every time I turn around sex is being used to sell something. Just watching all those commercials on TV and I wonder what they are really selling product or sex? Children even see commercials for drugs that can assist in sex. Sex has been part of our music probably since music has been sung and children hear it. So why do we attack our libraries? One reason we have trouble defining morality and the role that books should play it that. Another reason is the fact that we have not discovered yet that sexual assault, assault and other forms of violence are not only related they are “brothers and sisters from the same family”. We are very willing to hide sexual assault from our children when they should be made aware of it but we promote and justify violence every day. Look how many of our politicians have talked about putting a target on their opponent. The garbage that we hear almost daily from Greene and Boebert as we see them posing with their guns is not something that children should be seeing. I didn’t see it growing up and it shouldn’t be seen now.

Attacking our libraries is the wrong place to start when it comes to our children safety.  Maybe we should be working harder to give them the resources that they need to really understand what is out there and how they can prepare for it. I really think that is what the purpose of education is.

Florida school board member disgusted by pornographic books in libraries, demands disciplinary action- (bizpacreview.com)

Lucky by Alice Sebold | Goodreads

Lawn Boy by Jonathan Evison | Goodreads

Child Sexual Abuse Statistics – The National Center for Victims of Crime

Comments

  1. With MSM and Social Media, young kids are exposed to things we would have found unimaginable or astoundingly shocking not all that long ago. They should be able to enjoy their lives with some measure of insulation and protection from the harsh realities they will encounter soon enough. Who erased all the limits and boundaries that protect children?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  Tommy Tuberville made a comment about Biden eating an ice cream cone in New York City. He posted on X that “Hope @JoeBiden enjoyed going out for ice cream in NYC while the rest of the city is afraid of crime and migrants”. If Senator Tuberville was really an informed and knowledgeable lawmaker he would know that Alabama, the State that he represents in the Senate, has a murder rate that is three times the rate of New York City. I wonder if this is a case of another Republican lying and giving misinformation in an attempt to weaken our nation or is he just a politician that doesn’t have a clue to the real problems that face the nation and the State he is suppose to represent. Maybe it would help if Tuberville actually lived in the State he is supposed to represent. If you believe the Washington Post he actually lives in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida. I have been to Santa Rosa Beach and I have to admit it is beautiful there but that should not be an excuse for not living in the State you r
  If I was a parent of a handicapped or developmentally disabled child I would be very nervous right now. If I was a parent of a Gay or Tran’s child I would be very nervous. Why? I think that we have a person running for the office of President that thinks that it is ok to mock people with disabilities. President Biden is a stutterer and he has worked hard to overcome that disability. That should be something that should be an inspiration to not only people with disabilities but to the entire nation. He is a man that has risen above his stuttering to achieve remarkable things. By Trump mocking Biden because of his stuttering he is sending a message to the entire country it is ok to bully other people just because they are different or have a disability. Now Biden is a grown man that has had to endure bullying like that all his life and he has come out probably stronger because of it. Not everyone is as strong as Biden. Biden is not the first person that Trump has insulted because a h
  Trump’s oath of office, his lawyers are saying that Trump never took an oath to support the Constitution. Why would his lawyers say this? The reason is because the Presidential oath of office does not have the word “Support” in it. The Presidential oath uses the words “Preserve, Protect, and Defend” the Constitution. Why would the Presidential oath not use the word support? Could it be that the President is held to a higher standard than just support the Constitution? I have read that is the reason why that the words “Preserve, Protect and Defend” are used is to show the greater responsibility the President has to the Constitution. I think Trump’s lawyers want us to believe that Trump had less of a responsibility to our Constitution because the word “Support” is not in his oath. I think just the opposite; he had a stronger responsibility and failed at that responsibility, badly. Maybe that is because he never read the Constitution of the United States. Trump’s lawyers also say Sect