Skip to main content

 

It starts with the Constitution. You can ask what starts with the Constitution? I believe our nation being a nation of laws. It starts with our Constitution and then trickles down through all of our Federal, State and Local governments. Our Constitution is the framework on how our government is formed and the role that each branch of our Government plays in the day to day running of the nation. Our Constitution was set up with checks and balances that were supposed to insure that what they tried to make happen on January 6th 2021 never happened. Who is responsible? Where did it go wrong? How can we fix it? Those are some of the questions that should be being asked by everyone. The January 6th committee should have only been the start.

Richard Barnett from Arkansas was just found guilty for the role that he played in the Insurrection that occurred on Jan 6th.. Most of you will remember, he was the guy with his feet on the desk on Nancy Pelosi’s desk. He was convicted of a total of eight counts. He made a lot of statements on why he was there and one of his was that he was there to defend the Constitution. That sounds great and we have heard that a lot from the people that participated and supported the Insurrection.  There is one huge problem with that argument. Congress certifying the election was the Constitutional duty of the Congress that they were there to do. It was just the formality of certifying the results from every State. It was not meant as an avenue to overthrow or reject the results of each state’s results. In reality, what the insurrectionist were doing was not defending the Constitution they were trying to stop Congress from performing their constitutionally sworn duty. Richard Barnett stated he was there to defend the Constitution. When he was questioned about the Constitution the only thing that he was really familiar with was the 1st and 2nd Amendments. The actual written Constitution and the duty that Congress was performing that day he had no idea about. I would be willing to bet that was the case in many of the insurrectionists. They were fed a bunch of lies by Trump and many of the Republicans that supported Trump. They went there thinking that they had the blessing of the Republican Party to save America.

Richard Barnett entered the Capitol with the American Flag and a stun gun which by the way is a weapon. In one bold act he broke the law and he, in my opinion, desecrated our Flag. To use the American Flag to try stop Congress from doing their constitutionally sworn duty was just as bad or not worse than the protestors during the Vietnam War that burned our flag. If you will remember people wanted a Constitutional amendment banning the burning of our flag. Where are those people now that witnessed our flag being desecrated that day? They sure are being real silent. Our flag is not a weapon to be used by people that truly do not know what that flag really means or the sacrifice of the people that died first defining it and then protected it. “I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands”, the flag represents the Republic that they were trying to overthrow. That is just as big of a crime as burning it if not more.

Barnett stated that he didn’t get a fair trial because he wasn’t tried by a jury of his peers. That the political climate is different in Washington and that he couldn’t possibly get a fair trial. He wanted the trial to be held in Arkansas where he lived. First thing that I would like to say is if he wanted a trial in Arkansas he should have stayed home and not committed a crime in Washington DC. Funny how that works, you get tried where you commit the crime. Second, if all you can say that he was making a political statement so he really isn’t a criminal when a political statement is violent it is a crime. As we were all told during the many protests of the past protesting is not breaking the law. Violence is breaking the law. Violence is not a political statement that can be justified because you are mad at the Government. Violent protestors and many non violent protestors have been arrested during my lifetime and what Richard Barnett did falls under the definition of criminal. The third point is him asking to be tried by jury of his peers that think like he does. That is like a bank robbery only wanting to be tried by other thieves or Al Capone wanting to be tried by other members of the mob. Our judicial system doesn’t work that way.

What bothers me the most is the lack of disrespect that has been shown by the insurrectionists, by Trump, by members of the Republican Party, by members of the press. Mostly I am hurt by the lack of respect that many of the general public has shown to our Republic and the document that defines our Republic, our Constitution. Many had sworn an oath to protect and defend that Constitution, an oath that many broke. They were just words that had no real meaning to them because the document that they had sworn to defend had not real meaning to them. They try and call themselves patriots but you have to ask patriots to what? It is surely not our Republic.

Comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 25, 2023 at 4:18 AM

    Once again your article is well stated and explains in detail the way the constitution is supposed to work, I hope you reach the people that need to learn what they have and what they will lose unless they change their way,
    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  There’s a simple way to judge a country: look at whose lives it protects, and whose lives it’s willing to forget. For years now, we’ve heard the phrase “All Lives Matter.” It sounds fair. It sounds equal. It sounds like common sense. But a country doesn’t reveal its values through slogans. It reveals them through actions, through the lives it defends, the lives it ignores, and the lives it quietly pushes out of sight. And lately, America has been doing a whole lot of looking away. When Black Americans said they were being killed during traffic stops and routine encounters, the response from many leaders wasn’t concern; it was irritation. Instead of saying, “Let’s fix the problem so fewer people die,” we heard “Blue Lives Matter,” “Stop resisting,” and “BLM is a terrorist group.” A man died in a chokehold on camera. We all saw, from the beginning to the end. It was like a modern-day lynching. Millions marched peacefully. The answer from those in power was “law and order,” and “...
1 comment
Read more
  On Saturday, I was looking at Facebook and a person I was friends with, in fact, someone I went to High School with, posted something I knew was wrong. The post claimed that four lawmakers in Colorado decided jail time shouldn’t be mandatory for people who committed sexual assault of children. She claimed they were pedophile protectors. I opened up Perplexity and asked about the situation, and this is the reply I got back: You’re referring to a recent controversy in Colorado over a proposed bill that would change sentencing rules for certain sex crimes. Here are the verified facts to clarify what’s actually happening: • In early 2026, the Colorado House Judiciary Committee held a vote on a sentencing reform bill that aimed to give judges more discretion in certain felony cases. • Some lawmakers voted against an amendment that would have made mandatory prison sentences apply to all sex crimes, including child sexual assault, preferring instead to let judges determine sentences...
4 comments
Read more
  Dove or hawk? Donald Trump ran for President promising to end “endless wars”, avoid new ones, and put American families first. He cast himself as an outsider who would bring peace – the only candidate who wouldn’t drag America into another conflict. The message worked because let's face it, after so many years in Iraq and Afghanistan, America was tired of war. As a country, we were all tired of War. The country wanted stability, not another generation of men and women sent into danger. But once in office, he governed very differently. He governed like a Hawk, quick to threaten, quick to escalate, and willing to use both bombs and tariffs as weapons. What was missing wasn’t just consistency. It was an honor: the sense of responsibility and restraint that should come with the power to risk other people's sons and daughters. This isn’t about ideology. It's about whether someone who promised peace, but repeatedly chooses confrontation, can still claim to be a “dove”. A core...
2 comments
Read more