Skip to main content

 

A Conservative Christian. What is the hell is a Conservative Christian? I just don’t understand the concept. Sometimes I just want to write to vent because I don’t know how we can take something as pure as the perfect man and pervert it into something of pure hate. I look at what the Evangelicals stand up for and what I used to think that Jesus stood up for are two very different things. We don’t even have to talk about how Mary, Joseph and Jesus were asylum seekers in Egypt because Herod wanted to kill the Messiah. We won’t talk about how Jesus walked among the poor. We won’t talk about how Jesus opened up his words to everyone not just God’s Chosen People. I would like to know how what Conservative Christians do today and have come to think that they are doing the work of Jesus. Jesus did not sit in prayer sessions with Pontius Pilate. Jesus did not parade around with the symbols of Jerusalem or of Rome the two governmental powers. He did not walk around with the weapons of the day trying to intimidate people. Jesus didn’t walk around with pockets full on money. When he died, he died a pauper not a King. What little position that he had been gambled away by his executioners. How does any of this convert over to today’s Conservative Christian Movement?

We don’t have a security crisis at the border. We have a humanitarian crisis at the border. People coming here for a better life for themselves and their children. Franklin Graham in 2017 had stated that he was in favor of Trump’s stand on immigration because it wasn’t a biblical issue. That is an interesting thing to say by the son of the Father of the modern Evangelical movement, “not a biblical issue”. The demonization of people just trying to have a better life was not a Biblical Issue? Jesus seeking asylum in Egypt was a biblical issue and it is in the Book of Matthew so what is the difference? These are the things that really confuse me about Conservative Christians. People are dying trying to make a better life for themselves and for some reason this is not an issue for the church. I will ask how can this not be an issue for the Church? If we are all God’s so called children are not these people God’s children, also, deserving of our help? What is the Church’s responsibility to God’s children? Isn’t a person that isn’t a so called Christian still God’s children if he created everything? Is the Church supposed to be supporting God’s children or are God’s children suppose to be supporting the Church?  There is a huge difference in those two philosophies. Personally I think it is the Church that should be looking out for all of Gods so called Children not just a few that are wealthy enough to contribute to it. Do I think that the Church should be demanding that we all share our hard earned money with those less fortunate? I don’t know but I do believe that is one of the meanings of the life of Jesus. Remember according to the Bible didn’t he give everything including his life?

I wonder how guns and the Bible mix. Jesus didn’t appear to be armed to me so do people really think he would be running around with an AR 15 or an AK 47. Do you think that he would be carrying that Glock or the Smith & Wesson under his robe? I really don’t think that he would be doing any of those things yet, many in the church seem to blend the Right to Bear arms and the church like they are a match made in heaven. Violence and the church is not exactly the lessons that were taught me by Pastor Siersbeck when I was a child. He did love to sing “Onward Christians Soldiers” at the top of his lungs but I never envisioned Jesus with an Uzi. Never did I read about Jesus leading any army. His goal I always thought was to free men’s souls not free them from the oppressive Roman Government. Today church seems to be more of a tool for the oppressor than the savior of the oppressed.

Comments

  1. This needs to be the topic at every church every where!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent point! 💯

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  Tommy Tuberville made a comment about Biden eating an ice cream cone in New York City. He posted on X that “Hope @JoeBiden enjoyed going out for ice cream in NYC while the rest of the city is afraid of crime and migrants”. If Senator Tuberville was really an informed and knowledgeable lawmaker he would know that Alabama, the State that he represents in the Senate, has a murder rate that is three times the rate of New York City. I wonder if this is a case of another Republican lying and giving misinformation in an attempt to weaken our nation or is he just a politician that doesn’t have a clue to the real problems that face the nation and the State he is suppose to represent. Maybe it would help if Tuberville actually lived in the State he is supposed to represent. If you believe the Washington Post he actually lives in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida. I have been to Santa Rosa Beach and I have to admit it is beautiful there but that should not be an excuse for not living in the State you r
  If I was a parent of a handicapped or developmentally disabled child I would be very nervous right now. If I was a parent of a Gay or Tran’s child I would be very nervous. Why? I think that we have a person running for the office of President that thinks that it is ok to mock people with disabilities. President Biden is a stutterer and he has worked hard to overcome that disability. That should be something that should be an inspiration to not only people with disabilities but to the entire nation. He is a man that has risen above his stuttering to achieve remarkable things. By Trump mocking Biden because of his stuttering he is sending a message to the entire country it is ok to bully other people just because they are different or have a disability. Now Biden is a grown man that has had to endure bullying like that all his life and he has come out probably stronger because of it. Not everyone is as strong as Biden. Biden is not the first person that Trump has insulted because a h
  Trump’s oath of office, his lawyers are saying that Trump never took an oath to support the Constitution. Why would his lawyers say this? The reason is because the Presidential oath of office does not have the word “Support” in it. The Presidential oath uses the words “Preserve, Protect, and Defend” the Constitution. Why would the Presidential oath not use the word support? Could it be that the President is held to a higher standard than just support the Constitution? I have read that is the reason why that the words “Preserve, Protect and Defend” are used is to show the greater responsibility the President has to the Constitution. I think Trump’s lawyers want us to believe that Trump had less of a responsibility to our Constitution because the word “Support” is not in his oath. I think just the opposite; he had a stronger responsibility and failed at that responsibility, badly. Maybe that is because he never read the Constitution of the United States. Trump’s lawyers also say Sect