Skip to main content

 No Labels. You would think a person like me would like a party like No Labels. I have in my bio that I don’t like being labeled. I write that I am not a Republican or a Conservative, that I am not a Democrat or a Republican. I am an Independent American. All that means to me is I will vote for the party that serves the people. I will never serve a political party. My goal is to do my best for America and Americans, not to put a political party before our nation. 

No Labels seems to be getting its fair share amount to press lately. With today’s press I don’t know if it is deserving or not. Today’s press loves to sensationalize things just to sell us the news, to generate ad money. Are they real? I don’t know but I think that they are dangerous. The Election between Al Gore and George W. Bush would there have been a different result if Ralph Nader didn’t run as a Green Party Candidate? Many analysts believe that Ralph Nader swung too many votes away for Al Gore. Just think about all the possibilities that may have happened if Gore would have won? Ralph Nader and All Gore competed for the same voters, the voters that were concerned about the environment. How about the 19 million votes that Ross Perot got, did they ensure a Clinton victory? Would a No Label Candidate help or hurt either the Republican or Democratic Candidate running for the Presidency? I think that would be a distinct possibility. When Perot ran against Bush and Clinton no one got a majority of the vote. Clinton got 43% of the vote, Bush got 37% of the vote and Perot 19% of the vote. 

What I look at is where is the money coming from? A lot of the money for No Labels is coming from Billionaires. Some of the donors are Mac Rowan, John Catsimatidi and Carl Ferenbach. Donations to No Labels are handled by an online fundraising platform called Anedot who brags to have distributed billions to conservative candidates. No Labels has received a lot of funding from Republican donors. In 2023 No Labels received major funding from Harlan Crow who is a leading donor to Republican and conservative causes. He is also the Billionaire that just may own part of our Supreme Court through what appears to be some very unethical gifts. The web site Anedot charges political groups a 4 percent fee plus 30 cents per transaction.  That money bolsters Anedot’s mission to raise funds for the right and the GOP.  Their website says it has processed billions of dollars in contributions. Here are some of its clients: Focus on the Family, the Susan B Anthony List (a prominent foe of reproductive rights), the Thomas More Society (a conservative group that supported Trump’s election deniers), the Reformed Theological Seminary (which is committed to the Bible as God’s inerrant Word), and the International Alliance for Christian Education. I find its clientele scary. Very scary! These are not organizations that want to enhance everyone’s freedoms. I can’t help but think that the same thing can be said about No Labels. Is this how the so-called dark money is interjected to a campaign?  Billionaires funnel money to various organizations using third party organizations to shield them from what they are trying to accomplish. 

People that say they support No Labels are sick and tired of all the partisan politics. They say that they don’t want to support any particular political party so they join No Labels. Well guess what? No Labels is a Political Party. It looks like to me it has been established to siphon away moderate Democrats which would help the Republicans. It is just another way for the Republicans to win. If they can sway enough moderate Democrats away from supporting Biden then maybe a Republican candidate can win without being a favorite. Ross Perot swung 19 million votes and I think that many of those 19 million may have voted instead for Bush. History has a way of repeating itself and we just may see it happening again. No Labels just may be Trump's path to the White House and stay out of jail. 

We are in an era in which Billionaires not only want to own businesses but also what to own people. Mostly people in our Government. Citizens United opened the door to this and it has been growing and growing ever since. Very few politicians seem to want to get rid of all the dark money that is flowing in. A few Democrats have tried but their efforts have fallen onto deaf ears especially from the Republicans. You hear people like Trump wanting to drain the swamp when in reality they are the swamp. The swamp will never be drained until the money is drained from Washington. That money is coming from Billionaires that expect to be able to influence legislation in return. I have never heard a billionaire talk about how we can feed the poor. I have never heard a billionaire talk about how we get healthcare for everyone. Our climate is just getting worse and we still have politicians that are paid to deny climate change. 

When you have politicians running on an anti-woke agenda or complaining about the new Barbie Movie you have politicians that don’t want to deal with the real issues facing the average American today. When you are a nation of mutts and you have politicians complaining about diversity and inclusion you have politicians that are working just to keep us divided and not unified. Who benefits from a divided America? Well maybe a whole bunch of those billionaires who seem to want to own everything including you and me. 

4.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  Tommy Tuberville made a comment about Biden eating an ice cream cone in New York City. He posted on X that “Hope @JoeBiden enjoyed going out for ice cream in NYC while the rest of the city is afraid of crime and migrants”. If Senator Tuberville was really an informed and knowledgeable lawmaker he would know that Alabama, the State that he represents in the Senate, has a murder rate that is three times the rate of New York City. I wonder if this is a case of another Republican lying and giving misinformation in an attempt to weaken our nation or is he just a politician that doesn’t have a clue to the real problems that face the nation and the State he is suppose to represent. Maybe it would help if Tuberville actually lived in the State he is supposed to represent. If you believe the Washington Post he actually lives in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida. I have been to Santa Rosa Beach and I have to admit it is beautiful there but that should not be an excuse for not living in the State you r
  If I was a parent of a handicapped or developmentally disabled child I would be very nervous right now. If I was a parent of a Gay or Tran’s child I would be very nervous. Why? I think that we have a person running for the office of President that thinks that it is ok to mock people with disabilities. President Biden is a stutterer and he has worked hard to overcome that disability. That should be something that should be an inspiration to not only people with disabilities but to the entire nation. He is a man that has risen above his stuttering to achieve remarkable things. By Trump mocking Biden because of his stuttering he is sending a message to the entire country it is ok to bully other people just because they are different or have a disability. Now Biden is a grown man that has had to endure bullying like that all his life and he has come out probably stronger because of it. Not everyone is as strong as Biden. Biden is not the first person that Trump has insulted because a h
  Trump’s oath of office, his lawyers are saying that Trump never took an oath to support the Constitution. Why would his lawyers say this? The reason is because the Presidential oath of office does not have the word “Support” in it. The Presidential oath uses the words “Preserve, Protect, and Defend” the Constitution. Why would the Presidential oath not use the word support? Could it be that the President is held to a higher standard than just support the Constitution? I have read that is the reason why that the words “Preserve, Protect and Defend” are used is to show the greater responsibility the President has to the Constitution. I think Trump’s lawyers want us to believe that Trump had less of a responsibility to our Constitution because the word “Support” is not in his oath. I think just the opposite; he had a stronger responsibility and failed at that responsibility, badly. Maybe that is because he never read the Constitution of the United States. Trump’s lawyers also say Sect