Skip to main content

 

There is so much going on today that figuring out what to write about is hard. Do I write about Musk and DOGE? Do I write about Musk and our military plans? Do I write about Trump and his deportations? I think I will write about Trump wanting to shutter the Department of Education. Trump has now signed an executive order to close the Department of Education, according to NBC News. Trump has been promising that and now he has done it.  I am sure there are going to be a lot of lawsuits questioning whether Trump has the constitutional authority to shutter it. 

 The Department of Education was created by an Act of Congress during the Carter administration. The Republican President, Ronald Reagan ran on closing it but was never able to do it. George H. W. Bush wanted to be known as the Education President so it went pretty much untouched during his administration. In the 90s with the Republican-controlled Congress, stating they opposed the Department of Education, its funding grew by that same Congress. George W. Bush had his” No Child Left Behind”. It is almost like the Republicans have had a love-hate relationship. I too have had that same love-hate relationship. I am an old guy and I was educated before the Department of Education existed as a cabinet position. I will tell you that the schools in Kenosha, Wisconsin were excellent when I was in school. The Kenosha school districts had excellent programs like music and art.

The Department of Education does have a history before it became a cabinet post under Carter. In 1867 a Department of Education was created by legislation signed by Andrew Johnson. It was created to collect data about schools and provide advice just like the Department of Agriculture did with farmers. It became a bureau in the Department of the Interior known as the United States Office of Education. Even back then people were concerned it would have too much control over local schools. It had existed under various departments until it became its own Cabinet department in 1979. My point is that all the way back to 1867 the government recognized the need for a Department of Education in some form. The four key functions of the Department of Education are 1) establish policies on federal financial aid for education and distribution as well as monitor those funds. 2) Collect data on the schools and disseminate research. 3) Focus national attention on key issues in education, and make recommendations for education reform. 4) Prohibiting discrimination and ensuring equal access to education.

Will there be a huge change if Trump is successful in eliminating the Department of Education? I don’t know for sure but I have many concerns. One of my major concerns is with inclusion. When I was growing up, my hometown had a separate school for children with physical and intellectual disabilities. Today, children have been able to have the same school experience that every other student which I feel is the right of every child. Not everyone agreed with their inclusion in the regular classroom. They thought it took away from the classroom for the so-called normal students. With the Department of Education no longer being there to monitor civil rights will the rights of those disabled students going to be taken away? Are they no longer going to be welcomed in a normal classroom? They are part of the Inclusion that is part of DEI.

You could also call Inclusion as Handicap Rights. Many things we have today are just part of everyday life because of inclusion: sidewalk ramps, access ramps into restaurants, crosswalks that beep or countdown for the handicapped, and elevators to improve handicapped access to schools, jobs, and entertainment venues. If it starts with inclusion in the schools, you will have a hard time convincing me that it will not spread to every aspect of our society. Donald Trump has not shown very much empathy for the handicapped in the past. While campaigning he mocked a handicapped reporter that asked a question that he didn’t like. I have read an article where he told his nephew he should just let his handicapped son die and move to Florida. Is Trump going to return us to the day when students with disabilities were hidden away and taught in the basements of schools? Are we going to institutionalize people again because society doesn’t want to be inconvenienced by having them around?  Will taxpayers deem it is just too expensive for handicapped services including the services supplied by our schools?

I think when historians write about our society they will not only write about the successes and failures we make but also about how we treat the least of us by the people who have to most, who will be hurt the most as the federal government cuts back not only the money and the oversite of our schools. Even now you see many of our southern states like Oklahoma and Alabama lag behind the northern states such as Massachusetts with school support. To give more control to a State that already doesn’t value education will just hurt those children in the state more.  States that ban books will continue to stifle the learning of the children within that state. Oklahoma, a state that wants the Ten Commandments and the Bible in every school has one of the worst school systems in the country. Massachusetts which to many is one of the most liberal States in the Union also has the best school system in the country. Who will suffer the most will be the ones who are already suffering now. It will only get worse.

 

 

Comments

  1. As a resident of Alabama, a mother of 2 grown children, and a disabled woman, I can confirm that the loss of federal oversight will exacerbate problems with existing discriminatory practices.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  In 1776 we declared our independence against a Monarch that was above the law. I wonder what John Adams would think about what the Supreme Court just ruled. I believe, what the Supreme Court just ruled is contrary to what the intention of the men that wrote and approved our Declaration of Independence.   This Fourth of July it would be a good idea if everyone would start out by reading the Declaration of Independence. The words that always have always stuck with me are “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Do those words still hold true? The three branches of the Government get their just powers from the people. Not the rich people. Not the Republicans. Not the Democrats. It is...
This is my continued search on whether Trump has the Character to be President. A person I know stated “His character matters bc it is in the character I believe he has the leadership, knowledge, wisdom, experience, compassion, integrity that will lead us on the path towards a more safe, secure, healthy, prosperous, free world than the direction we are headed.” My last blog looked at his character as integrity from a legal standpoint before he even was elected President. From a legal standpoint there is no way I would have thought he had the integrity to be President. Now I will look at some of his Moral Integrity and Compassion that should be there from the man that sits in the White House.  I have to say something about Donald Trump, he sure is a believer in the institution of marriage. He likes marriage so much that he has said “I do” three times. What his problem with marriage is the actual vow that he has to take. You know that love, honor, and cherish until death do us part. ...
  I will tell you that I am no Christian, but I will tell you that I was raised in a Christian household. I was baptized, went to Sunday School, was Confirmed, and attended church into adulthood. Because of that upbringing, I still think about the morals I learned from that religious upbringing. To this day, I judge right and wrong by what I learned in that church. There has been a little bit of a dispute between The Pope of the Catholic Church, the Trump administration, the deportations, and Catholic convert Vance and his use of the concept from the medieval Catholic theology known in Latin as “Ordo Amoris”. I guess Vance has said the concept delineates a hierarchy of care – to family first, followed by neighbor, community, fellow citizen, and lastly those elsewhere. Being raised a Protestant I had never heard of it but then the Lutheran Church has no medieval saint.   I searched on the web and asked if “Ordo Amoris” was in the Bible and the short answer would be “no”. It i...